'I know in the liberals eyes, anything goes, no standards, values, there is anarchy, do “what feels good”—a lot of drugs going on. But you see that doesn’t work in the real world.'
[How can there be liberal political parties if liberals believe in anarchy?]
'I believe liberals have a party of anarchy.'
35 comments
No such thing as a "party of anarchy." A "party" in this context is a political organization. "Anarchy" is a denial of organization. You can not have an organization based on the fact that the organization in question does not exist. That's just idiotic.
No no, they have an "anarchy party," where they all get together, drink expensive and snooty red wine, eat over-priced cheese and bread, and have mildly loud and sophisticatedly humorous conversations about neander-cons.
Have you seen an "anarchist party" in your life?, NO MAN, because it´s part of the plot of being consequents to their way of life. Second, if they don´t believe in laws and the such, why do they bother so much when there is a law about torture or invasion of the privacy?
Groucho: Now, it says, uh, "The party of the second part shall be known in this contract as the party of the second part."Chico: Well, I don't know about that...
Groucho: Now what's the matter?
Chico: I no like-a the second party, either.
Groucho: Well, you should've come to the first party. We didn't get home 'til around four in the morning... I was blind for three days!
I know in the liberals eyes, anything goes, no standards, values, there is anarchy,I believe liberals have a party of anarchy. anarchists you're thinking of!
Edit: Prince Macho belly for the win! I LOVE that movie!
"'I know in the liberals eyes, anything goes, no standards, values, there is anarchy, do “what feels good”
a lot of drugs going on." "But you see that doesn’t work in the real world."
The real world? You've actually been there? After your previous sentence, I naturally assumed otherwise.
Seriously, of course that sort of thing doesn't work in the real world. The problem is that you and your ilk are the only ones claiming that anyone else even tries to live like that, let alone tries to propagate it as a political ideology. So YOU are the ones who are failing to interact with the real world, LJD.
"I believe liberals have a party of anarchy."
You can believe cyanide is an aphrodisiac, if you like, but that won't make it reality any more than this insane declaration reflects reality. Words such as "liberal," "anarchy," and "party" have specific meanings in this context; I suggest that you go learn them.
~David D.G.
Anarchy means no Bill of Rights, no constitution, no police, no laws against murder and theft. Thusly I have to to tell you that those words do not mean what you think they mean.
Actually, anarchists would need no government or law enforcement (there would be rules, at least the Golden Rule) because they would act in a respectful manner towards one another.
and does anarchy involve more government intervintion in the economy, more funding for health, education and welfare, higher gun controls and no war except in the case of defence, just some of the left-wing values
@Sandman: wrong. Try reading up on things before posting . That way you don't look ignorant, and you'll be criticising the fundie OP got valid reasons.
Also, anarchists generally oppose participation in representative democracy in favour of agitating for direct and consensus democracy and the like, but this is not universal and at least some anarchist parties do exist. What's more common is anarchists running as independents - I recently voted for an anarchist candidate for the Senate (ack! Voting! Something else anarchists Don't Do!).
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
