And no matter how nice a man seems, I always say, we never know what they’re doing when alone with animals or babies. And you can see it in most young boys’ violence.
61 comments
As an atheist, I'm already well-versed in eating babies and satanic animal sacrifices.
But overall I am a nice guy, so l guess what she says does indeed has some truth to it.
At least she doesn't blame Grand Theft Auto.
If the basic tenets of feminism were actually true; that women can do everything that men can and do it just as well and that violence and masculine behaviour are objectively bad things, then - following this line of thought to its logical conclusion - the radfems who want to live in a world without men would be quite right.
After all, men are verifiably more violent than women and have a higher proportion of criminality. This persists regardless of cultural context. Since masculinity is defined by feminism as a bad thing and since there's much evidence that the behaviour of men is innate as opposed to learned radical feminism makes perfect sense if you build upon the initial feminist preposition.
Fortunately, most liberals don't think things through.
And no matter how nice a man seems, I always say, we never know
Yes!
Men should be kept in cages from birth and only milked for sperm for in vitro reproduction by those poor dimwitted hetero women.
> and that violence and masculine behaviour are objectively bad things
Not one of the basic tenants of feminism. Maybe a tenant of radical feminism, but we both disagree with that.
> This persists regardless of cultural context.
[CITATION NEEDED]
This woman is crazy, but JimboSpice is also an ignorant asshole. Jimbo, are you actually saying that you don't think violence is "an objectively bad thing"? Because, if we're talking about violence between human beings, then I'd have to assert that, yeah, it is a negative thing, and in a perfect world, humans wouldn't feel the need to physically harm one another.
Don't try and use the example of one radical feminist (or "radical feminists" in general) to make broad statements about feminists or liberals in general. But then, I know it's probably pointless to say that to someone like you, the man who doesn't believe that a "black guy" could be an astrophysicist. Have you Googled Neil DeGrasse Tyson yet, Jimbo? I'll bet you haven't.
Er, there are female pedophiles and animal abusers also, dumbass! If you don't see that, you're no feminist. Feminism is equal rights AND responsibilities, regardless of gender.
(When we had a general conscription army, it was just the boys who were called. I always felt that it can't really be "general" if only half the population is expected to join. I really, really didn't want to join the army, but I still felt that it was wrong that I wasn't called to do it.)
I read a little bit into her diatribe before my eyes started to bleed!
The usual staff about patriachal persecuution, and how she "chose" her lesbianism, before the usual man-hating and contempt for trans-folk.
It does make me wish that they'd abstain from all man-created stuff to see how long their purity survives
Okay, not all men are violent, sexual psychopaths. As a perfectly well-adjusted man, I tell you this: either dispel this appalling ignorance or fill up the gas in your car, MapQuest Tartarus and GO THERE.
P.S.
I browsed another of her "essays" - "Lookism"
this is wher men are being blamed for being attracted to pretty women and trying to court them, while not giving things to plainer girls.
It's all men's fault of curse that women are so obsessive about their looks, and part of the conspiracy to keep women isolated.
I really think som epeople have too much time on their hands, too much hate in their hearts, and a grudge the size of the rock of Gibraltar
@ #1570663
... Feminists use gendered slurs?
(I viscerally disagree with Bev Jo there, and she appears to be some kind of ass-for-a-mouth fucknugget but... really?)
And from your mission statement lady, I shudder to think what happens when you're left alone in a room with any male puppies or children and ready access to scissors.
As for the Nutty Professor, I ignore him as much as possible these days.
Yes. I hear that sometimes when men are alone with an infant they will place their mouths upon a baby's bare belly and make a comical flatulent sound until the baby erupts in a fit of giggles.
I also hear that when left alone with a dog they will rub the animal's belly, whipping the dog's leg into a frenzy, all the while chanting, "Who's a good puppy?? Who's a good puppy!?"
Seriously. This happened. Monsters, I tell you. Total monsters.
Bev, you're not a feminist, you're a nutcase.
JimboSpice also knows fuck all about how human psychology actually works.
I was in a group therapy session once when someone, fighting through their obvious deeply felt shame, recounted their abuse at the hands of their mother.
After they had finished, first one, then another, then another, then another, then another man in the group recounted their own abuse, sexual and otherwise, at the hands of female relatives and family friends.
So on their behalf I'm here to say a big fuck you, you hateful sack of shit, fuck you to hell.
When I'm alone with my dog I'm petting him or feeding him, and when alone with my children I'm usually playing with them, putting on kids movies for them to watch, or feeding them.
Answer your question? It's sad that you think that all men are mindless Neanderthals who want to screw everything they see.
Oh and do I really need to bring up what Andrea Yates did when she was left alone with her children?
@Deep Search
I confess, I had done both of these things before reaching my 18th year. I am truly, then, the most vile of the vile.
Well Bev... since I'm still carrying the scars my mother inflicted on me when I was just a handful of months old, and since we keep on seeing cases of women maiming and/or killing both animals and babies, AND since I am still carrying the mental trauma inflicted on me by my mother when she raped me...
Can I assume that you believe it's only bad when a man does it?
Bev, get a headshrinker. Your paranoid delusions are becoming disturbing.
Jimbo, you should join her in this endeavour.
sometimes i looks around me, and i'm saddened by the knowledge that everything that can die, will.
but other times, i read fstdt, and i see a silver lining to that hard truth.
Speaking as a politically incorrect Secular Humanist, "Nature abhors a vacuum." Your man-free Utopia would only last long enough for some pissed-off Butch types to fill the vacancy. Never underestimate the potentially viscous nature of any human being. It's a survival skill, no matter how antisocial it might be, and therefore part of the lexicon. 5,000 years of laws with varying degrees of harshness have not eradicated it.
As for BevJo's screed above, it's guilt by innuendo. It's as improper as my saying, "I would never consider trusting Bev Jo alone with 5 gallons of ice cream."
In fact, she has a lot in common phillosophically with that other dreary bitch, Mary Sunshine. To wit:
A. Men are inherently domineering, rapacious sexual predators, with whom sexual relations are inherently so ungratifying that women only enter into them to be supported.
B. Women are inherently so weak that they can only interact with men by being conquered and exploited.
And both solutions-either accept it as inevitable and pretend to enjoy it, or accept it as inevitable and secede from the heterosexual world-are dreary-bitch solutions.
Bev Jo would fit right in with the Tea Party:
TP: Lesbians choose the gay lifestyle
Bev Jo: ditto
TP: Women encourage rape by making themselves sexy
Bev Jo: Yeah, but men started it by encouraging women to make themselves sexy.
TP: All gay men are pedophiles.
Bev Jo: Yeah, and all straight men are pedophiles, too.
TP: Women don't belong in the military because only men have the proper killer instinct.
Bev Jo: ditto
Well there is a sane, nonsexed version of this that says you can't tell the monsters just by looking at them.
In that regard, that no matter how nice anyone seems, male, female, or intersexed, they may be capable of horrendous cruelty to anything that can not defend itself, the statement above is true.
Bev's belief that only males are capable of wanton cruelty is delusional. I'd guess that the percentage of humans that will do evil for the sake of doing evil is about average thru any demographics you care to name.
@ Often Partisan:
Sadly, for my Gender and Sexuality Studies degree (wanted to round out my education with a non-hard science, and I come from a family of political activists), I had to read lots of crap like that, I was already aware of Bev Jo by reputation, even if I hadn't already read her drivel.
@ Cyclonus:
Ah, that makes a lot of sense, actually.
Okay kid, let me give you a tip from an actual feminist: GENDER ROLES HURT EVERYONE. If you are perpetuating said gender roles, you are hurting the feminist movement. So do everyone a favor, and get the fuck out of my political movement.
When I am alone with animals or babies, I generally ignore them unless they need walking (animals), changing (babies), or food (both).
Then I lie down and read a nice book. I am not a pedophile, I am a bibliophile. How is that for a perversion?
DFM
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.