“The absurd idea of two males becoming co-husbands in a "marriage" is something no one even remotely imagined just 50 or 60 years ago.”
Same could be said for interracial marriage. Women admirals. Gay CEOs. Times have changed. You have no point.
“The fact our own military”
When you say ‘our’ military, you mean the military of the Nation of the Free, made up of citizens to reflect the wide range of citizens that it’s to defend in times of war, right?
Why shouldn’t OUR military recruit OUR citizens, and obey OUR laws?
"now supports this atrocity”
Atrocity is a word. It has a meaning. Citizens in a secular country NOT facing religious discrimination is NOT an atrocity you dumb bunny.
{as if it's "no big deal" is proof that Satan has made significant inroads into a once strong and apologetically masculine American institution.”
I think you mean unapologetically?
Yeaaaaaaaah, i served with a few of those toxic fuckers. Guys that thought manhood was measured by how many prostitutes you left unconscious in Subic Bay, or how many beers you could drink and still make it back to your boat. Guys that insisted anyone who ate pussy was gay, and beat up anyone who wasn’t as manly as they were.
"What's next, I wonder ....”
Oh, spare us your imagination.
“a remake of "The Longest Day" where a guy marries his buddy before the invasion of Normandy?”
OH! There’s an Idea. restage 300 as the invasion of Normandy, but replace the 101st Airborne with the Sacred Band of Thebes.
Heh.
And the OP thinks they’re mocking the concept as an original thought.
