to those slagging off creationism as if it wasn't scientific, the theory of evolution is not science but a religion devised with one purpose- to do away with the God of the bible, because if the genesis account is inaccurate you may as well forget about the whole text.
just as well then that the genesis account can easily be proved to be scientific, if you look at the evidence ie fossil record with a different set of glasses
37 comments
"if the genesis account is inaccurate you may as well forget about the whole text "
Come on, just one more step, you can do it!
WTF?
Are you people, Andy (and many others), imbeciles?
There is nothing scientific about creationism, it's religious bullshit.
"to those slagging off creationism as if it wasn't scientific, the theory of evolution is not science but a religion devised with one purpose- to do away with the God of the bible, because if the genesis account is inaccurate you may as well forget about the whole text."
And that, gentlemen, is how I became an atheist.
"just as well then that the genesis account can easily be proved to be scientific,if you look at the evidence ie fossil record with a different set of glasses"
Blacked out glasses perhaps?
"just as well then that the genesis account can easily be proved to be scientific, if you look at the evidence ie fossil record with a different set of glasses"
Genesis is scientific in the same way that I look like Sean Bean. That is: if you close your eyes and think about Sean Bean, I look like Sean Bean. That's not going to help me win any Sean Bean lookalike contests, though.
"theory of evolution is not science but a religion devised with one purpose"
Who supports the idea that, upon the invention of a time machine, we should immediately use it to go back in time and kill the first person to ever call evolution a religion? Sure, it is cruel, and needlessly violent, and could have untold ramifications on the events leading up to the present, but we would never have to hear crap like this again. I personally think it is worth the risk.
"if the genesis account is inaccurate you may as well forget about the whole text"
Can't argue with that.
"if you look at the evidence ie fossil record with a different set of glasses"
Yes, those wacky X-ray specs that you bought from the back of a comic book. Probably the only thing you have read other than your bible. Actually, you probably have not even read that.
image
"to those slagging off creationism as if it wasn't scientific, the theory of evolution is not science but a religion devised with one purpose- to do away with the God of the bible, because if the genesis account is inaccurate you may as well forget about the whole text."
It's a good thing Webster is dead. He'd probably be a bit upset that he compiled an entire book full of word definitions and you're too fucking lazy to make use of it.
"just as well then that the genesis account can easily be proved to be scientific, if you look at the evidence ie fossil record with a different set of glasses"
The fossil record directly contradicts your fairy tale. Both versions of it.
"In biology, evolution is the process of change in the inherited traits of a population of organisms from one generation to the next." -Wikipedia
Huh... Nothing about religion here.
"if the genesis account is inaccurate you may as well forget about the whole text."
If CERN doesn't have anti-matter cans like in Angels & Demons, then we can forget they exist.
...if the genesis account is inaccurate you may as well forget about the whole text.
Way ahead of you, douchesack.
...if the genesis account is inaccurate you may as well forget about the whole text.
Ahead of you there by about three decades, bub.
This always reminds me of a question I asked in german elementary school during religion class.
"So if God created humans first, wwwwhhhhhaaat happened to the dinosaurs ?"
I didn't get an answer...
@ Hadron
That picture is now my desktop. And did you know that that guy's right ear is higher up than his left?
Anyway, I'd like to look at the fossil record with those glasses.
"if the genesis account is inaccurate you may as well forget about the whole text."
Then why are there so many Christians who believe that Genesis 1 is an allegory? Or is this a No True Scotsman issue?
ah Melanie Phillips, another moron who drifted from liberal to far right (possibly under the temptation of money)!
If I wear rose tinted glasses even shit looks pretty.
AS a hack journalist, her opinion is as valid as my goldfish's, or less actually since she's writing for her audience and hence money
the genesis account can easily be proved to be scientific, if you look at the evidence ie fossil record with a different set of glasses
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
