Females should be distributed equally among men
Due to the relentless hypergamy in this modern age, we are facing a crisis where thousands, maybe even millions, of men are dying without ever experiencing basic human needs like sex and intimacy; all because of the fact that cuntrags were granted sexual freedom, in which has resulted in them only wanting to date up rather than settling with their looks-match. However, by distributing femoids equally among the male population, many men will finally be able to experience the desires that have been robbed from them from a very young age.
The idea I propose is as follows: firstly, the government should take away the right where cum dumpsters could choose their partner freely - it had done nothing but damage so far - so it is not needed anymore. After it is done, the government should implement an objective rating system which will allow them to pair up femoids with their ideal looks-match male. For an example: if a femoid is 4/10, then it should be paired up with a male who is only equal to its rating; not higher or lower. Also, this process should be done within both the genders age groups. Like, an eighteen year old femoid who is 4/10 should be paired up with a 4/10 man who is also eighteen years of age. However, all femoids and men should be paired up with each other before they reach the age of twenty. Anyone (especially bitches) who goes their way to date a person who is more good/bad looking than them will be publicly lynched and hanged for meddling with the balance of this law.
13 comments
Looksie, don't you ever get fucking bored of this? There are so many things you could do, and you choose to do this? Over, and over, and over?
I don't want a woman assigned to me with no input from either of us - especially not if the distribution happens according to such a meainingless and pseudoscientific criterion as "objective" physical attractiveness. I want to find that one particular kindred spirit with whom I fall in true love and who falls in love with me, and together, we shall go through life as true companions.
Bl ue balls are not fatal.
Anyone who refers to women, collectively, as cuntrags doesn't deserve a date, much less an assigned partner.
Yes, randomly and forcefully shuffle people`s wives, mothers, sisters... You`ll make the record time for a mob of angry men raping you with pitchforks and/or hanging you on the nearest aviable lamp post.
No, there aren't "millions" of men in that pitiful state. It's just you, and half a dozen other whiners, and even they have a chance. But look at our government: what if it is just as hopeless at "female distribution" as it is at "middle class tax breaks"? You still would get none, and Chad and his wealthy friends will get another dozen each.
Have you ever been a recipient of government services?
Even if the government actually did what you wanted you're not going to be happy with what the government provides.
..."Anyone (especially bitches) who goes their way to date a person who is more good/bad looking than them will be publicly lynched and hanged for meddling with the balance of this law.
From someone who claims to be a black person, that statement is especially abhorrent.
But nah, it's totally your looks and women having too much freedom, right?
@ #2124627
Typical communist thought
Not so. Powerful communist regimes have historically had an abhorrent disregard for human life and most rights but creating a social underclass and outright classifying people as property goes against the core of their beliefs. Communists believed citizens had duties to the state and collective responsibilities to society sure enough but this is not even close to comparable to that mindset. Their propaganda centers around the equalization of the masses through controlled distribution of wealth and social power and breaking down the very idea of social class differences. Creating another class difference out of gender is directly contrary to this central talking point and was impractical to them, nonsensical even. One need only look to recent history to see this as in the USSR women had considerably more legal agency and workforce representation than in the US for quite some time and feminist movements to rectify this were denounced as communist plots. Even today you'll find a lot of idiots repeating that sentiment. The backslide on women's rights in Russia since communism went defunct is a more recent development fueled by "traditionalist" and religious rhetoric. Both things communists disdained. If you want to randomly switch a topic to communism and hate on it try to at least make the transition a little less left-field and the substance a little more about something communists actually did.
Since devising an objective attractiveness ratings scale is impossible, I'm not worried about the rest of your fantasy, well, except for the fact that an adult male has these fantasies.
So a prostitute would not help because she would not give you "validation"... but a sex-slave assigned to you by the government just for virtue of being male amd surviving to the age of twenty totally would?
At least with the prostitute, you at least managed to have the money needed to hire her at your disposal.
@ Pharaoh Bastethotep
I maintain my theory they crave a shallow affectation of normalcy above sexual encounters, and their limited visual summation of relationships and whatever scraps of media they absorb paint girlfriend and wife as a permanent job position mandatory for women to seek or pledge to serfdom received as a man's right when he comes of age rather than what you or I or any human being not afflicted with their specific madness would call a relationship. What's more for a prostitute sexual encounters are on their terms, not the incel. It has a tangible gain rather than being an expected duty or mere function. Incel fantasies center around being able to threaten to withhold something to keep women and the children they expect to have in line. They need to believe women are dependent on them for the basics of survival and will not leave for fear of an inevitable slow death or fate worse than death. If the incel is a woman's client she's the one with the power - he needs something from her and though the interaction is much closer to the bargaining they've convinced themselves relationships are the incel is not dictating terms to a supplicant.
But for the immediate fixation on sex they view it as something that needs to be uncompromisingly selfish, parasitic even. If an incel is not the sole beneficiary in terms of dynamics or basic pleasure they imagine they're being preyed upon. Has it struck you that in the twisted fantasies they share with each other incels very clearly do not intend for women to derive any form of pleasure from the sex they are expected to perform (indeed it's painted to be pretty goddamned horrifying) and express disgust at women who enjoy the act in any way including masturbation? And that every time they hear about a mutually enjoyable relationship they immediately believe men are "cucks" being abused somehow?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.