The "Equal Pay" is perhaps the easiest Feminazi lie to debunk. Why should women receive "equal pay" with men, meanwhile, the female gender itself has sexual value, proved by the existence of prostitution? A prostitute can sell her sex, to men, for $100 to $1000 in a single night. This proves that women don't need jobs, at all. Women have their sex, inherently, to sell. So a woman having her sex to sell, on top of "Equal Pay", gives her too much value. It gives average women way, way, way more power than average men. And that is what "Feminism" truly represents, a misappropriation of social power.
26 comments
Male prostitutes do exist, but no where near the level of female prostitutes, also women are not as inclined to just have sex with a stranger. Unless it's for personal gain.
Which is why Unomes argument is full of shit, normal women don't have prostitution as a side job along with their normal jobs. The majority of women aren't prostitutes. The "advantage" he speaks of doesn't exist.
Not even taking things into account like slut shaming, STDs, and rape.
Why? Because a woman often has to work twice as hard to be seen as almost as good as a man; she deserves equal pay.
The male gender has sexual value too; there are male prostitutes as well. A prostitute can sell his sex, to women, for about the same amount. This proves that men don't need jobs, at all. Men have their sex, inherently, to sell. So a man having his sex to sell, on top of more-pay-than-women, gives him too much value. It gives average men way, way, way, way more power than average women. And that is what "Patriarchy" truly represents, a misappropriation of social power.
Fixed that for ya.
Besides, would YOU want to sell your “sex” to different women each and every night, Unome?
But Unome, what is stopping a man from doing the same thing? If a man wanted to sell his sex for that much, he is more than welcome to do so. Of course prostitution is illegal in several places across the country.
Men have sex to sell too, dumbass. Any person with a sex organ can be a hooker.
Filing a tax return on that income, however...gotta be a nightmare.
Come on, Unome. This one was wide open! The women-only-make-three-quarters brigade have bad statistics and any number of things, and you write this baloney?
@Kuno:
Not that those contributing factors are good things (I think some improvement and reform in leave, workweek, and overtime would go a long way to resolving the time-in-career gap, and have the side effect of preventing companies from squeezing its workers without penalty -- weren't we supposed to have 30-hour workweeks thanks to computers? Of course, the fat cats make us work as hard as ever and pocket the productivity gains for themselves...), but bad stats are bad stats, and unfortunately, ideologues are ideologues -- who cares if the data is garbage if it supports their delusions?
If all women sold sex the price would go down. Then there would need to be welfare support. That simply will not do.
Some women are lousy lays anyway, who wants that ?
Not a compelling argument.
I suspect that the majority of male prostitutes' customers are other men, especially if they can supply meth. Ted Haggard would know.
I also suspect that this whiny little man-child is just bitter, because even as a male hooker, he still had no customers.
A prostitute can sell her sex, to men, for $100 to $1000 in a single night. This proves that women don't need jobs, at all.
Except for the fact that in most of the country, prostitution is illegal, and, this is the big one, most women don't want to be prostitutes.
That's like saying that male prostitution exists, so men don't need jobs at all.
@#1788512:
Hm, all I can find on the issue basically agrees that even adjusted for all these factors, women are still earning less than men in similar jobs. And that’s not counting the fact that these factors are discriminatory themselves.
Today is wage equality day - only in mid-April does the average woman's income equal what the average man earned by the end of the previous year.
I want to see this asshole explain to his mother that women are valuable only as sex workers.
not only do most women not want to be prostitutes, they CAN'T be; that'd flood the market and depress wages to the point where prostitutes would all starve. (seriously, no matter how oversexed a species we are, we couldn't hope to support half our population that way. nobody's willing to pay for that much sex.)
considering that prostitution is currently quite often a desperation career, there are likely too many prostitutes even today. were it economically and socially possible for some of those individuals to leave the sex work sector, prostitutes' labor market and wages would probably improve considerably --- and very likely the quality of services provided, too.
Equality is "misappropriation"?
Oh, and Rent-Guys exist, Udumb.
A prostitute can sell her sex, to men, for $100 to $1000 in a single night. This proves that women don't need jobs, at all. Women have their sex, inherently, to sell.
No, it proves that people will pay for anything as much as they think it is worth. If only a very small number of women could be prostitutes, they could charge very much more than $1,000 per night as demand would be so great. on the other hand, if, as you suggest, all women could be prostitutes, then their services would be worthless because of the vast oversupply of sexual services. So the "added value" you attribute to women's sexual services is meaningless beyond the ways in which this argument makes you look pathetic.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
