So Darwin doesn't imply that life moves in a linear motion? Then how does darwin explain time?
55 comments
Darwin doesn't do much these days.
The those understanding and accepting the ToE don't have to explain time, as time in relation to the ToE needs no explanation.
In a larger picture, I might ask, how does anyone explain time? Einstein had trouble defining time, stating that "Time is what is measured by a clock."
Wait, I had a good joke there, but then I realised that physics is a fundamental of chemistry which is a fundamental of biology, hence a physicist could explain evolution from a genetic point of view.
Yes, because everything that exists in time must have linear motion.
Errrrr.
You haven't quite thought this one through, have you?
Evolution is influenced by changing enviroments.
"Then how does darwin explain time?"
He refers you to Einstein, who tells you that time is what is measured by a clock.
Life is like a branch in a tree. That is not linear, surely.
Oh, and Darwin died 128 years ago. Science have moved on each day since then.
“So Darwin doesn't imply that life moves in a linear motion?”
“Then how does darwin explain time?”
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
