[On abortion]
I have a penis women do not. Women have no right to tell me that I can't use my penis to rape little boys.
I'm supporting gender doesn't have anything to do with morality.
You would claim that I am harming the little boys with my penis that you don't have.
I claim that women are killing human life with the womb I don't have.
34 comments
Oh, c'mon. He's not advocating molestation.
I haven't read the thread yet, so this is speculation, but ... I'm gonna go ahead and guess that this was the sequence of events:
Kahalachan: Abortion is teh bad.
Woman: You don't have a womb, so keep out of it.
Kahalachan: Ok, fine, but you don't have a penis, so don't tell me how I can or can't use it.
He was attempting to show the absurdity of the "you don't have it, so keep the hell out of it" argument. His analogy sucks, though, so he failed. He failed at life, as well.
Jesse-
That seems like the most likely context, but in fact the actual discussion was about whether the father of the fetus should have a say in whether the woman gets an abortion, since he contributed the sperm.
Apparently, since pregnancy is just 'getting fat and throwing up once in a while,' and since childbirth is 'like passing a kidney stone,' the man plays an equal role in the gestation of the child.
Jesse:
"Kahalachan: Abortion is teh bad.
Woman: You don't have a womb, so keep out of it.
Kahalachan: Ok, fine, but you don't have a penis, so don't tell me how I can or can't use it."
Fortunately, we don't need women telling him not to rape little boys with his penis; I'm fairly certain that any rational man will be more than willing to help him with that decision. So, yes, one could make his logic apply if they wished, since his conclusion that he can rape boys doesn't follow from his premise that a woman can't tell him not to.
It was a reducto ad absurdum, against the argument "No one has the right to tell you what to do with your body". I defeated that argument alone, and didn't mean to use that against all of abortion. Plus I'm not a fundie so I don't see why Sierra submitted this.
[1] Raping a little boy does not hurt you -- being pregnant can and does hurt women, whether it be simple morning sickness or life-threatening complications
[2] A little boy can think and feel. He will be traumatized and damaged by this incident, and both during and after, it will cause him considerable pain and suffering. A fetus can't think or feel. A fetus is not self-aware. A fetus is just that -- a fetus. It is not a human being.
In a case where someone is harming another HUMAN BEING , gender doesn't matter in the least when it comes to the question of, "Should I interfere?"
There is no comparison, asswipe.
I have a gun you do not. You have no right to tell me that I can't use my gun to shoot little boys.
I'm supporting the first amendment doesn't have anything to do with morality.
You would claim that I am harming the little boys with my gun that you don't have.
I claim that you are ruining human life with the stupidity I don't have.
Women have no right to tell me that I can't use my penis to rape little boys.
Unless that little boy happens to be my kid. Then I'll cut your penis off, stuff it down your troath, and watch gleefully as you choke to death on your own penis.
Hmm, I think we've got a pedophile here. Oh, FBI...
By the way, women can't harm people with their wombs. You can harm people with dicks. Your argument is invalid.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.