I found this image a while back... Took me a while to find this again... You know the video that was released of the Pentagon Attack? The video that just shows a blip on the screen and then an explosion. Well you cannot distinguish what the object is. Why would they hide the Videos? Perhaps because they can be freeze framed and people would see what actually hit the Pentagon. Take a close look at this image.. The bottom image is a Cruise Missile painted as an American Airline's Jetliner. Very close comparison isn't it? Especially when flying at a low altitude cruising at around 400+ MPH...image
43 comments
Take one cruise missile, slap a new texture on in some flight sim, ignore how it doesn't look anything like the plane you want it to look like...
No, you moron. It was actually nine flying saucers (class KMA-II Goering), tethered together and painted to resemble an airplane. The Moon Nazis aren't dumb enough to use something as obviously non-plane as a cruise missile.
That's obviously a very bad photoshop job. I could probably do better using MS Paint.
Funny how conspiracy theorists claim that real photos are photoshop jobs, while obviously faked photos are real.
Comparison between a jet and a cruise missile...
Real-life: not even close
Photoshop: still not even close
The 9/11 Commission report estimates the impact speed of Flight 77 as over 500mph. But let's use your estimate of 400mph. That's really fast you know? In metric, it's 178.8m/s. A Boeing 757 is a little bit less than 50m long, but we'll go with 50m for now. I'm being kind to you here Knightly.
I know the video you speak of, from a fixed camera position. It is just a blip as you say. Now, how quickly would a 50m long plane moving at 400mph pass a fixed camera point? I'll tell you. It would pass the camera in 0.3 seconds. Bit less actually. I'm rounding up, to help you again. If I use the real numbers (48m length, 530mph) we get 0.2 seconds to pass the camera. You see why it was a blip dipshit? Because it was only visible to the camera for a fraction of a fucking second. It's likely that a cruise missile wouldn't even have been a blip before it exploded, because it would have passed the camera in less than a 1/10 of a second. Damn you 9/11 truthers are ignorant bastards.
Funny. Normally you get Freeptards around here.
Guess DUmmies can be just as bad.
Thanks for showing that everyone has a crazy wing, DUmmies!
Cruise missile: 21 feet (6.4 meters)
But hey, just imagine what a cool explosion a cruise missile of that magnitude would cause!
there would be no need for cover -up anymore...
The fuck is that background for the MS paint plane/missile even supposed to be? It looks like a fucking Bob Ross painting of the ocean.
I would call Poe, but I know how conspiracy theorists operate...
Edit: my name is J. James, damn autocorrect, what the shit is a "Jamess"?! Sometimes I think it just makes up stuff on it's own.
The thing that pisses me off about the "truthers" when they claim that no aircraft hit the Pentagon is that they completely ignore all the people on board that aircraft who died. If I were a friend or family member of someone who died on that flight I'd be totally pissed off that they just casually ignore the lives of those who were unlucky enough to have boarded that flight that day. I don't think it would be too hard to find families of those who died on all the 9/11 flights to disprove the stupid conspiracy theories, but to the "truthers," those people don't matter and real truth is an inconvenience.
@Joe Mama
The claims I've seen that the towers/Pentagon were hit by missiles usually claim that the real planes were flown somewhere in secret, the passengers were removed, and then executed.
Which leads to the question, if the government was going to kill them anyway, why not just fly the planes into the buildings in the first place?
This is the best type of conspiracy insanity, because it's far more believable that someone could think like this compared to the "Illuminati Atlantis Lizard people" things, yet still incredibly UNbelievable that someone could be this monumentally stupid.
Top Image: American Airlines plane, I think I flew in one once.
Bottom Image: Obviously a rendered cruise missle, retextured with American Airlines textures, not to mention done very poorly...
I think it's obvious how ''similar'' they are
Edit: guess I wasn't the first to mention that.
You know, normally I hate to give fellow FSTDTers shit for screwing up, but the quality of the photoshop is utterly irrelevant here. Try focusing on the fact that there are quite a few people who can spot plane types by silhouette only and no one but a one-eyed UFOlogist would EVER mistake a jet liner and a cruise missile. The original photoshopper is not even wrong, so who cares about his dubious talent?
As an aside, this makes me glad I don't read DU...
@BrianX
Except it does matter, because look at it. LOOK. AT. IT. A geriatric mole couldn't be fooled by that fucking disgrace. That's the humor here, not some vague observation you made that disproves the conspiracy.
I simply cannot get over how bad of a shop that is, seriously.
My god, I could to a better job in fucking MS paint!
So many people are missing the point here. Yes one is bigger than the other but then again it's a physical impossibility to get a 767 in the space given at the Pentagon. Not to mention it's already been proven that there was no plane found at the Pentagon.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
