At the same time I knew that wearing a dress made me look and feel more feminine. My husband liked them. I liked me in them. More importantly, it helped me maintain a more submissive attitude toward my husband, and a more ladylike attitude with everyone else. It helped me in my walk as a Christian woman. So what was I waiting for?
--------------------------------------
THEN my husband threw a wrench in my spokes when he asked me to stop wearing underwear under my skirts. This was NOT an order, so don’t go getting all upset with him. This was him half-jokingly telling me he’d really love it if I were perpetually “available” to him, and since he is such a wonderful husband, I wanted to submit to that request.
So now on cold days I wear crotch-less pantaloons with knee-high socks or hose. They are made from soft cotton muslin. They usually have a ruffle or lace at the edge. They are comfortable and definitely make me feel feminine, and I am still “available” for my husband. Problem solved.
115 comments
You should really get yourself a thigh-high pair of lace top stockings, black, with seams, attached to a nice black corsette with lots of lace. Damn, it's getting warm in here.
Your husband and you deserve each other.
I guess this should turn me on but I'm just not interested in women dumb and weak enough to allow themselves to be turned into nothing more than a walking hole. Now, a girl who orders ME to wear crotchless panties, THAT'S hot.
Fundie erotica?
Ewwwwwww!
I got a mental image of her doing the dishes. The husband walks in and just bends her over while she finishes the dishes.
The whole website is really scary, never mind this quote. They believe all good Christian households should have a man at the head, who will willingly spank his wife when she is out of line. The women there believe it's for their own good.
Organized religions have always been bastians of misogyny, but this is really the icing on the cake.
I think I'm going to puke now.
I feel strangely drawn to this post. Over and over and over again. No, wait.... No, I stand corrected. I just feel strange looking at this post. Very strange. Almost like there is a burning in my loins. Could it be.... a burning bush experience? No... no.... Strange. I have not felt this way since watching 2 girls 1 cup.....
As a woman, I want to say that's absolutely abhorrent and disgraceful, but at the same time she does it willingly, so I have the absolute most conflicted feelings over that. Funny shit, though.
Well I'm back... It is kind of like hanging out at the back of the porn shop where the peep shows are, looking through the glory holes....
Shit, just saw Jeremy PC's post. Now I have E.D.
The first few sentences on the link:
Until this century, women basically wore dresses. They ate, danced, worked, played, and breathed in dresses. They even rode horses in dresses.
So just which century is Leah living in? This century is the 21st. Women didn't tend to do all these things in dresses in the 20th, at least the second half of it.
In the comments, Daisy says: My husband actually makes me wear snug fitting panties after a spanking as a reminder throughout the day to help me behave.
The article on the main page is about spanking. BDSM for Jesus!
Well, having kinky things going on between married couples is healthy, IMHO.
But posting them on the net, that's not very modest.
Yeah, I was feeling horny, and when my wife bent over to get something out of the freezer, that was all I needed to see, I fucked her brains out, and it was good for both of us. Unfortunately, we're banned from that grocery store now.
How stupid are you people? It's a very thinly veiled bondage fantasy masquerading as hardline Christianity - the author of that piece is probably not even religious, he is *role playing* his fantasy. All the sanctimonious self congratulating me-too posters here should stfu. Even Bro Randy is starting to look less stupid by comparison.
To the guy that runs fstdt.com:
This is the second time you've been conned. This site is an excellent idea, but I'm starting to think you pass the reins along.
Yeah, I doubt if she's as hardline Cristian as she's coming off. Any good fundy girl would never think anyone would be upset with her man and say "This was NOT an order, so don’t go getting all upset with him." If anything she'd be saying how overjoyed that her man still desires her, or something to that effect. Poe may be a bit strong...I'm going for a vote of role playing.
This person must be for real. She always posts in all forums where they critisise CDD, Christian or not. However, she also writes that crappy literature. Could It be that she's actually a man or a BDSM writter trying to make it more appealing to the religious female audience?. Just a thought.
@Millin
Lol :) thanks for letting use know. :)
And fyi, the creator of this god awful sight is a woman I believe.
Three things Millin ,
First - the site administrator is a woman. A non-fundie woman who is very intellegent and can write computer software. Shocking, I know.
Second - she does not approve of posts to FSTDT. That is done by regular members in the Public Administration section. If there are repeats or Poes on the forum, it is because members of FSTDT have been fooled.
Third - You are free to leave and start your own website at anytime, if you don't like it here.
This also from Leah: "And since all the snake handling women in Kentucky wear only dresses, would everyone would look at me and think I was a religious nut?"
You are a religious nut, although one who apparently still enjoys good sex. It's just one step further to those snake-chuckers and getting bit every Sunday.
crotch-less pantaloons
crotch-less pantaloons
crotch-less pantaloons crotch-less pantaloons crotch-less pantaloons!
Sorry, I just couldn't resist.
God the repressed are kinky.
It's so true that Christian girls make the best sluts. Preacher's daughters, Catholic schoolgirls, Leah here... All the sustained outward neutrality just serves to bottle up and compress sexual impulses into a seething, boiling critical mass.
*Seething, boiling, critical mass....
Ughhhhhh! On another site, that might be a complete turn on. But picturing a fundie wearing crotchless Pantaloons... ewwwwww . I mean, do these women even shave their legs?
Damn, I need a girl like that too. Absolutely perfect. Sexy, feminine, submissive women. Fundie or not, we need more of them.
"helped me maintain a more submissive attitude"
I didn't know dresses were considered S & M gear.
Your storytelling is awkward. Did you actually stop wearing underwear and now you only wear pants when it's cold, but they have no crotch?
You're crazy... Wearind S & M dresses...
I love the comment, "Then my husband threw a wrench in my spokes..."
Ahhhh, lady, it was a little more than a wrench. More like an IED
You know, this post IS messed up because these women think that all women should HAVE to be submissive to their husbands because men are superior, bible,etc but now I can't stop thinking about doing something like this next time I see my boyfriend >.> Because good 'ol bdsm without the infusion of weird religious ideas is fun.
This is not fundie. This is bizarrely-rationalized kink. Admittedly there may be cultural factors at play, but this is clearly consensual, and she seems to be fairly happy in her D/s relationship. "Since he is such a wonderful husband, I wanted to submit to that request" != "Being a woman and hence naturally inferior, I was compelled to submit to that request."
And seriously, people, stop indiscriminately calling these women weak, stupid, crazy doormats. Some of them are, but not all; it doesn't take a doormat to be a willing submissive.
@Angel Kaida
This is not her being a submissive for sexual play. The entire website is dedicated to women being submissive and allowing their husbands to spank them whenever they step out of line. They use bible verses to prove that men are better then women and that men have the power to unleash corporal punishment on them.
They think women are not logical and just a bundle of emotions, and need a man to spank them to keep them in line. These women honestly believe that their husband is above them and that he has to right to abuse them. Check out their main site instead of their blog. They have lots of articles on the issue. This is all about how they believe the Bible God wants them to live.
Kuzih: I can read. Some of the site, if it's not Poe, is definitely fundie. However, I don't believe this particular quote has anything in it that implies ideas of natural inferiority, an inability to think, or anything other than the behavior of a run-of-the-mill submissive. This quote is NOT fundie.
Also, being "submissive for sexual play" is only one fairly limited kind of consensual D/s; there are many people who are still submissives in nonsexual/all contexts.
@Moordryd:
"First - the site administrator is a woman. A non-fundie woman who is very intellegent(sic) and can write computer software. Shocking, I know. "
This is just awful - clumsy sarcastic, awkward and just, well, idiotic. Misspelling "intelligent" hardly bolsters your case, although I'm very glad she "can write computer software".
Your second point is well taken, although the old layout didn't make this clear.
More to the point, evaluate criticism rather than being reflexively defensive. This should be abundantly clear from watching the fundies.
You know, normally I'd object to this, but I want to be spanked while wearing crotchless panties too, so . . .
...
oh, PANTALOONS. Yah no.
On a side note, who runs FSTDT now since Yahweh retired?
I, like many of you, is attempting to suppress a raging boner, with mixed success. It sounds hot on paper, but something in my mind just wouldn't accept it as consent if it was for religious reasons.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.