The evolutionists don't want to admit to it, I encourage all of you to question evolution and not herd along with it like 'everyone else' it has flaws, check them out.
11 comments
By all means, ask questions. We only ask that you listen to the answers.
Hey, we can dream can't we?
Don't worry, there are thousands upon thousands of scientists checking every flaw in the Theory of Evolution. Every biology scientist wants to find a new facet of Evolution, to be the one who updates it. None of them are interested in status quo for the sake of status quo.
What won't the "evolutionists" admit to? If you're open-minded, you question EVERYTHING, including evolution.
Of course I questioned the theory of evolution. I'm sure many of us did. But it held up to our questioning, and that is why we believe it is correct.
You, on the other hand, are nothing but a member of a herd of sheeple.
Yes, our current theory of biological evolution surely has some flaws.
In contrast to "intelligent design", which is just plain and hopelessly wrong.
This means that on the one hand there is still enough work to do for scientists, and on the other hand that creationism and "intelligent design" should go where it belongs: Into the dustbin.
Many of us have checked out the "flaws", many of the Flaws are unknowns or theoretical disagreements all exposed by the scientists themselves. That evolution, change over time, has happened is fact, not opinion, and no one actively in the arenas of evolution will deny it.
When Ganthore suggests you check out the flaws he immediately has ruled out the "evolutionists" (read : all educated, qualified scientists ) as liars. In other words he (like many) suggest only people who don't understand evolution or think religion trumps it (Ham, Hovind, Comfort, Robertson and that ilk) are to be trusted. That's the people they will send you to to check out the flaws.
"The evolutionists don't want to admit to it, I encourage all of you to question evolution and not herd along with it like 'everyone else' it has flaws, check them out."
Evolution was questioned till the cows came home in Kitzmiller vs. Dover. Yet, Judge John E. Jones III - a Conservative Christian - found for the plaintiffs. Why? The defendant's case had flaws. Check this out:
'cdesign proponentsist'
And you wonder why Michael Behe's 'evidence' and testimont was made a laughingstock by Judge Jones ?
Kitzmiller vs. Dover was the final nail in the coffin of the Creation vs. Evolution debate - and the former was found wanting. And via this case, ergo Evolution is fact . 'Intelligent Design' - and therefore, by definition Creationism - is lies .
The law says so.
Q.E.D., bitches. Deal with it.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
