Hey, Ive got another one that throws a curveball to the Darwinists (ie evolutionists)
I guess God showed them.
But I definently think Evolution is stupid. (Now I do believe that God can change the genes of a specific animal or what have you. But I believe that it is God doing it and that it doesn't "just happen").
Like when I was in highschool, I had to watch a stupid video on how the earliest ansestor of multi cellular organisms was the sea spunge. Yea you read it right, a sea spunge, that non moving thing that just sits on the ocean floor created all this world, Hey, guess what, Shh, this is a secret. A SEA SPUNGE CAN ONLY CREATE ANOTHER SEA SPUNGE THROUGHT BREADING. The Idea that some how millions of years ago, some how the sea spung grew legs and walked off and turned into a fish is Crazy.
Well next time you watch Spunge Bob Square Pants, that's our earliest ansester, give me a break
67 comments
Must not comment on the spelling. Must not comment on the spelling.
The Idea that some how millions of years ago, some how the sea spung grew legs and walked off and turned into a fish is Crazy.
Damn right it's crazy, since fish don't have legs .
The bumblebee flight thing is fairly easily refuted, too.
Turns out bumblebee wings generate lift on both up- and down-strokes (as opposed to birds, which only generate lift on the down-stroke) so the amount of lift being generated is almost twice what JJL seems to think it is.
Although I was tempted just to say 'Rimsky-Korsakov says NO!'
I'm more than happy to comment on the spelling as well.
When the statement "But I definently [sic] think Evolution is stupid" is in the same entry as
"sientists"
one realises that this time, stupidity has actually come up to him, bit him on the arse and sat on his face until what was left of his brain was permanently damaged due to loss of oxygen (possibly an improvement). And he STILL didn't recognise it.
I'll ignore the spelling t point out that, a good few years ago now, scientists found that yes the bumblebee could in fact fly. Which, seeing as how everybody knows it does, was treated as a humourous story in much of the press, but they actually found out the scientific mechanisms used.
So, does that mean that 'they showed God'?
The Bumble Bee, did you know that the Bumble Bee is not suposed to fly. The way it is constructed it is according to sientists to heavy to fly. They can't even explane it.
Rubbish. The mechanics of insect flight were investigated and well explained by Torkel Weis-Fogh of Cambridge University in the 1970s.
We have the calculations. We win.
Actually, its your spelling that's not happening, man. Are you for real or do you truly not know how to spell? Because really, you can't come across as serious if you can't even spell sponge.
"But I definently think Evolution is stupid."
Well, we're one up on you there, Josh, because we defintiely know that you're stupid.
What I perpetually fail to understand is why the Crazytionists constantly believe that one individual of a certain species give birth to a life form of another species, a long time ago. Once again, evlution didn't (and still doesn't!) work that way!!! So no, bananas can't give birth to elephants, and sea sponges certainly don't give birth to fish, with or without legs.
The sheer audacity to bitch and moan about what is 'suposed' to be, and what is stupid; maybe you should go back to fucking grade school and learn how to fucking spell!
If you watch Sponge Bob, you should be able to see the correct spelling on the television screen! Your post is a hideously decorated with some of the most stunningly awful and painfully obvious mistakes that a pre-pubescent blind kid could pick up on. There is something like a dozen and a half mistakes in your post. Why the hell would anybody listen to what you have to say when we can hardly read it?
You make Spongebob and Patrick look like a pair of intellectual giants.
What would motivate god to manipulate genes? Surely he would have created species 'perfect' for their niche in nature in the first place. Or is he just fucking with us?
I find it very difficult to believe that you went to highschool. I suppose you spent all your time in prayer and praising the lord instead of paying attention to what you were being taught.
What was your SAT score? Negative?
Ha ha ha ha, maybe this kid should have payed attention in school! Sponges reproduce by budding, not 'breading' (though that would be kind of funny) and fish do not have legs.
I could take the time to refute every single point of this post but I would be wasting my time, Josh here wouldn't get any of it.
This is ingorance beyond most fundies, almost troll-like....
The fact that you can't even spell "sponge" is a testament to your educational level, and correlates directly with the amount of laughter you will receive from anyone with a functioning brain.
It might do you some good to read a science book published within the past 50 years.
"Well next time you watch Spunge Bob Square Pants, that's our earliest ansester, give me a break"
Wait, is Josh saying he thinks SBSP is a documentary?!
Come on people, this is pure Cretinist prose! A work of art!
"...SPUNGE THROUGHT BREADING" can't be improved upon. Sublime.
Well, several varieties of seafood are enhanced by breading, but I don't think sea spunges or sea sponges are edible.
P.S. From your horrible spelling and grammar, it's clear that biology is not the only course you flunked in high school.
So...you are attacking Darwinists (who the fuck are they anyway?) because they admitted to not understanding exactly how the bumblebee is able to fly. "They can't explain it" doesn't mean there is not a natural explanation for it, just that it had not been discovered yet.
I don't think he just flunked every science class ever, I think he never took one.
These sientists are inferior for admitting not to know how everything works, but your answer is "I guess God showed them". Nobel Prize!
I possessed a better command of the English language than this pathetic specimen at three years of age .
I possessed a better understanding of basic science than this pathetic specimen at five years of age .
Please, will someone tell me that this sub-amoeboid decerebrate is the exception rather than the rule with respect to the output of the American education system? My tropical fish could out-score him on a SAT ...
"Hey, Ive got another one that throws a curveball to the Darwinists (ie evolutionists)
And that's where I broke into laughter and stopped reading.
"Like when I was in highschool..."
Bullshit, you've never even been within one mile of a institution of learning.
Puck: "pure Cretinist prose"
I like that. Can I use it sometime when someone in my immediate vicinity writes something moronic? And can I pass it on to an English teacher I know? He would SO appreciate it when it's time to grade essays.
Someody tell him/her/it to stop!
"Breaded Sea Sponge" is making me ill just laughing!!!
If I ever stop laughing, I might suggest Troll?
"They can't even explane it. I guess God showed them."
Because as we all know kids, if you can't immediately explain something that means God did it. There's no way you'll ever find the answer in the future so you might as well give up as the only answer is God did it. This is obviously how mankind's knowledge of the universe and everything got to the stage it is now.
*sigh,* No. It is not true that bee's aren't "supposed" to fly and that scientists can't explain it.
What is true is that the way a bee's wings work is much more complicated than the way a bird's wings work, which had some scientists confused for a little while, but they figured it out.
If a bee flew using the same motions a bird uses, than yes, their wing size/body size ratio would be too small. But bees fly differently, and there's nothing mysterious about it.
The bee thing was put to bed a long time ago, by someone who actually took the time to figure out the answer. It's on snopes.com.
And the only thing a sea sponge can create through breading is a Krabby Patty.
@"Current"
SpongeBob is not a sea sponge. Sea sponges don't actually look like the ones you use in the shower.
simple facts of life, do you expect him to be able to differentiate between synthetic foam sponges in a supermarket and actual live Porifera?
Especially as the material used to manufacture the former appears to form the bulk of the material occupying his skull, judging from the quality of his written output?
As a high school biology teacher, I must remind myself to make sure I teach "Sea Spunge Throught Breading", if only I can figure out what that is. Actually, it kinda sounds like some exotic food, so maybe I need to call a chef.
Didn't this kid hear that scientists know how the bumblebee flies, even worked the physics out.
Sad.
"Hey, Ive got another one that throws a curveball to the Darwinists (ie evolutionists)actually they can. bees have this interesting setup around their wings so that the wings flap themselves and they can move much faster. the bee only has to start and stop, not flap. I doubt you got that, but there it is. you can probably find a better explanation on the internet; I don't really want to go into to much detail right now I guess they showed you that belief is called theistic evolution and it's widely held among educated christians I can't have read it right. because it looooked like every time you wrote it you wrote "sea spunge" and thoise don't exist... unless you were thinking of a sea spo nge. It's reproducing, not covering things in bread crumbs, this is a general warning to all fundies: it is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid, than to open it and remove all doubt.
If it was too heavy to fly, I do not think it would be flying everywhere, stupid.
And technically our earliest ancestors were protein spheres or something.
Grammar and spelling, did you miss that in high school? Maybe you missunderstood evolution just as much?
If the bumble bee was created by "intelligent design", oughtn't it to be more "intelligent"? The strangeness of it even more suggests that it just happened to be like that.
Evolution does not work like that! The seasponge did not just sprout legs and walked off, idiot. Like you said, it took millions of years, but one step at a time.
Are people this stupid really allowed to graduate? Shouldn't they be held back a year, or five?
Here's the first clue scientists had for Bumblebees being able to fly:
Bumblebees fly (not real well though)
It wasn't on the top of anyones list to explain it since it's just another flying insect. If Bumblebees in fact had a domestic purpose we would breed them and have probably have an entirely different breed today
It was figured out and documented years ago and only Creationtards don't realize this or pull this old myth out to this day.
This is why your lot can't work in science, because God and magic are your defaults to everything.
You're not looking for answers,you're denying them and you're trying to censor the questions
Whilst Bumblebee couldn't fly - as he was a mere Autobot - but if the ex-Decepticon Jetfire had donated his parts, and was energised by Jolt (and whilst only Optimus Prime could have defeated the Decepticon leader The Fallen), yes, he could have been able to fly.
[/smartarse] [/ 'Fantasy Technology' nerd]
...oh, and BTW: the anime series "Excel Saga" >>>>> "Spongebrain Nopants".
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
