You sound like the evolutionists. They laugh at the creationists who demand that evolution be subject to empirical tests to determine its validity. They laugh because they cannot prove evolution using empirical experiments and all they can do is laugh. I suspect that you are laughing at Berggy because you have no means to disprove that which he says.
23 comments
"You sound like the evolutionists."Thank you. I am an "evolutionist."
"They laugh at the creationists who demand that evolution be subject to empirical tests to determine its validity."
No, we laugh because you wouldn't know an empirical test if it wore a big sign saying "I'm an empirical test" and bit you on the butt. And, as has been pointed out, we laugh because creationism lacks even the scent of an iota of supporting evidence.
"They laugh because they cannot prove evolution using empirical experiments and all they can do is laugh."
It appears you need to recheck the data in the ToE vs creationism debate.
"I suspect that you are laughing at Berggy because you have no means to disprove that which he says."
I must have missed Berggy. I am laughing at you, wretchin'.
"I laugh at your assertions for you see, you couldn't laugh at an evolutionist on the laughingest day of your life even if you had an electrified laughing machine!"I Laugh, Therefore I Laugh
Wow. Not only did you fall out of the stupid tree, you hit every branch down, fell into the Lake of Denial, hit rock bottom, one of your cuts got infected with a bit of Twistingthefactsitis, and then I think you broke through the crust of the planet and fell into the molten core of hipocrisy.
"They laugh at the creationists who demand that evolution be subject to empirical tests to determine its validity."
....mostly because it already is. And creationists asking that this be true of evolution when there own creationist beliefs are so laughably devoid the same is more than a little comical as well.
I laugh at your outright lies.
By the way, shit-for-brains, 'evolutionist' isn't a word.
"the creationists who demand that evolution be subject to empirical tests to determine its validity."
And there is evidence for the changing of creatures over time, You just won't give it any time or insist it's never enough. It's proven but it'll never be proven to you, not because there isn't evidence but because you refuse to accept it.
Yada yada yada scientists lie
Ahem...:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._coli_long-term_evolution_experiment
Evolution proved , ergo Cre(a)ti(o)nism dis proved. Now, unless you want the pointing & laughing at the more-than laughable alternative that your so-called 'true' Bible Cre(a)ti(o)nism supposedly represents, with it's notions of a bat that lays eggs, rabbits that chew their cud, insects with four legs, and a talking snake (as well as a donkey, post-'Flood'; so why don't they still exist to this day...?!), to say nothing of a man made from dirt, and a clone-woman made from his rib (So why did the Religious Reich's last, best hope for their agenda's very existence [b]have to be hidden under the facade of pseudo-scientific 'Intelligent Design'[/b]; surely the 'Truth' shines through by itself, does it not...?! ) to continue...:
image
...your turn.
...oh, but then - via the pseudo-science of 'Intelligent Design' - it was empirically tested, certainly in the white heat of legal experimentation, in the lab of the courtroom in 2005: Kitzmiller vs. Dover. A Court of Law . Where not even your supposedly 'True' Bible is admissable as evidence, and that alone should tell you something; especially when one considers that the presiding judge - John E. Jones III - is himself a Conservative Christian, personally appointed to that post three years earlier by George Dumbya Bush.
It - along with the defence's star (certainly expensive) testifying witness's credibility in the scientific establishment, Michael Behe: a Professor* of Biochemistry & a Creationist , no less - was laughed out of court almost to the day eight years ago. You sound like the Flat Earthers, retchin'. >:D
*- I'm laughing at the 'superior' intellect. [/James T. Kirk] [/Doug Piranha-levels of sarcasm] >:D
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
