please help me with a bad feeling that my family has about this new election. in revalations you can see discussions about clintin ,not for battom but please read now hillary is running and if you add up the letters of each of her names it comes up with 666 plus the fact of before war relations with powers that embedded with terrist against our christ!!
59 comments
in revalations you can see discussions about clintin Revelations does not speak of Clinton. You may imagine that it does, but of course, that does not make it any more true.
[...] hillary is running and if you add up the letters of each of her names it comes up with 666 [...] A void point. One can easily add together names, house numbers, pets' names, birth year, or other personal information and come up with ties to powers, events, or locations.
[...] plus the fact of before war relations with powers that embedded with terrist against our christ!!" Cheney used to have close ties to Saddam Hussein, yet the neo-cons are voting for him.
And "relations with powers that were part of terrorism against Christianity"? Please specify.
How do you add up letters? There are several ways, one being to assign each letter a number based on its position in the alphabet (A=1, B=2, and so on). So "ABC" would be 1+2+3, which would add up to 6.
Snopes has a very funny parody of this absurdity in one of its articles (scroll down the page).
Okay. Ignoring, for the moment, the fact that numerology is bull, how exactly did you come to this?
Hillary Rodham Clinton = 7, 6, 7
HILLARY = 85 = 8+5 = 13 => 1+3 = 4
RODHAM = 59 => 5+9 = 14 => 1+4 = 5
CLINTON = 87 => 8+7 = 15 => 1+5 = 6
Oh wait,
CLINTIN = 81 => 8+1 = 9
85 + 59 + 87 = 231 => 2+3+1 = 6
There's a few 6s in there, but not one 666, or for that matter, any occurrence of more than one 6 in a row.
And of course, Rodham is just a maiden name, you probably didn't use her given middle name (Diane, according to Wikipedia)
Thoroughly debunked.
please help me
OK. You're entirely right. THE WORLD WILL END AT THE NEXT ELECTION! It'll be hell on earth. Quick, there's no time to lose, go out and buy shedloads of canned peas and glowsticks, and then barricade yourself and your devout friends in your basement. Nail the door shut, or better yet, brick it up from the inside with buttresses; you won't need to get out again when you're raptured, and the horrible things out there will certainly try to get in!
OK, so I'm feeling mischievous today, guys. Go easy on me :-)
An entire family lost for the realm of the sane ...
You see, I got no personal reason to be against (organized) religion other than that my skin peels off in church service (because they are boring). But some get sucked in into this stuff more than it is good for them.
Heck, I was raised christian, but I never thought Christianity was about a literal fight of good and evil, about a personal god, that is surprisingly powerless. Look at that, would any sane god let such messages slip into his holy writings?
Ok, just to amuse myself, I did the math.
If you take the numerical values of each letter in her the name Hillary Rodham Clinton (a=1, z=26, so forth) and add them together, you get:
231.
Oooh, Satanic!
Now, if you use the actual numerological equation, that is, to strip out all non-Roman numeral characters and add up the rest (
ILLDMCLI), you're left with two possible values:
If you take them as a sum, regardless of order, you get 1752. If you take them in the order that they appear in her name, you get either 550 or 652 (so close!) depending on how exactly you do the math.
So, any way you cut it, you lose . Of course, you can't spell, so I guess maybe you can come up with 666. That's doesn't (a) make 666 the number of your mythological beast or (b) make you right.
-pb
Well, your post is incoherent, the only part I can understand is the "hillary...clintin" = 666 thing.
Well, I got news for you:
RONALD WILSON REAGAN
Count the letters...6...6...6...OH NOES!!!
By your definition, Reagan was the antichrist. Good thing he got alzheimer's and forgot to end the world.
The thing that is setting me back the most is the grammar. The first sentence, although not capitalized, is seemingly decent enough. From the start of the second sentence, it all goes to shit.
HOLY FUCK, is she saying verbatim? of from bottom?
Either way, without starting a new sentence, or even segmenting her single message, she urges you to continue reading. To think any of us could do anything but stare at idiocy is plausible, but not a damn lick of fun.
My favorite part of this whole post is the horrible run-on second sentence with far too many prepositional phrases at the end that to serve no purpose. Let's all assume this "child of Christ" had enough intellect to put a period somewhere near the end of her thought around the number 666. What the hell does this mean
"plus the fact of before war relations with powers that embedded with terrist against our christ!!"
Paranoid religious psychos always think you are against their christ.
If I were you, I'd have a much worse feeling about your grammar and spelling.
The election went fine; you didn't got landed with another imbecile dolt, but an intelligent, well-educated and articulate man.
>2007
Ten years later...!
Then I trust you voted for Hillary before then.
Hindsight isn't 20-20, I think you'll find.
Not for Bannon .
Almost a stopped clock there, littleshit.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.