"1) Neither Darwin or Lyell had "any" degrees in science."
And? Neither did the first guy to discover fire. His discovery was still valid though, due to his careful observation that fire burns like a bitch if you get too close.
You don't need a degree to discover something, jackass. It's your science itself (i.e., observations, experimentation, data collection, etc.) that matter, not where you went to school.
I have no degrees either but I'm pretty sure that if I discovered a way to make cold fusion a reality I'd be invited to the Nobel Prize awards.
"2) Darwin's only degree was in theology. He was going to be a preacher before he boarded the Beagle (ship)."
Who doesn't know this?
"3) Lyell had a degree in being a lawyer. But he wrote the book that made Darwin question God."
Your point?
"4) In the day that Darwin earned his degree in theology, what they taught was Bible literalism. Which also means that Darwin was taught and believed in the literal six day creation. Which would make him a YEC before he rejected God to write his theory."
Again, so? People can't change their mind or what?
See, rational people tend to do that when presented with evidence contrary to what they accept as true. People such as yourself tend to bury your head further up your ass so as to drown out any dissenting opinions.
"5) Lyell was basically a Bible scoffer who hated God, and used a type of intelligent peer pressure technique to convince people to his way of thinking."
Isn't that what you creationists do? Point to all of your degrees (either outright bogus or in entirely irrelevant fields) and say to the gullible, "Look how smart I am! I must be right! Trust me!"
"Which basically told people that unless they believed the way he did, they would be deemed as ignorant and uneducated. And as you probably know this same technique is used by evolutionists even today."
You seem to have misspelled "creationist" there, buck-o.
"So if you ever wondered why evolution seemed so well put together to conflict with YEC. You have to remember that the person who wrote it turned against YEC because of the peer pressure Lyell wrote in his book."
Just how delusional are you anyway?
"And if you wonder where the actual idea came from for man coming from animals. It was from part of Darwins teachings where he had to learn about other pagan religions while earning that theology degree."
The idea, in some form, has been around since the ancient Greeks. Probably earlier. Most reasonably intelligent people who take the time to make such observations quickly determine that there are simply too many similarities between humans and other animals for there not to be some sort of link between us.
"So the idea that man came from animals can be traced back to the time of Moses. Where Egyptian religion believed this, and their gods were half man half animal."
The Egyptians, to my knowledge, did not believe any such thing.
"So evolution actually has it's roots in Pagan religion, and Darwin was not the originator of that idea."
It has no roots in "pagan" religion, or any other religion. It has its roots in careful and detailed observation of nature.
And nobody said Darwin originated the idea. He formulated the idea in that he did all of the hard work of observing, cataloging and correlating the data and then went a step further to actually work out why he was seeing what he was seeing.
"He just made it popular, and introduced it to science as a way to replace God and the Bible that he had rejected."
Science did not then, does not now, and never will have any need for your god or Wholly Babble. Darwin didn't "introduce it" to "science" to replace anything as nothing like it existed before other than some vague ideas and general hypotheses.
