you can’t give me the sequence of mutations that ‘evolved’ anything—.to you even asking is ‘ridiculous’ can’t question your faith in the hairyone can we?? laughable
you’re a liar. you can’t deal with the facts, and cannot defend your hairygod darwin, so you have to lie for that racist. I’ve already proven it, you’re just too stupid to get it. no surprise, you are an atheist after all!
since you cannot give the sequence of mutations that led to humans from apes—I already have. and given the eye in a squid is very similar to a human eye—you have to believe somehow the eye evolved in very dissimilar lines, or the eye was designed—which makes more sense??? obviously design..except to the IMAMS of the hairygod darwin—
41 comments
"your hairygod darwin "
Epic, epic fail.
Fuck you, you bigoted prick.
I'd elaborate, maybe refute a few of your more glaring errors, but really...would that make a difference?
Why are these ignorant freaks so obsessed with the idea that anyone has to "worship" the propounder of a good, logical idea? I can only guess that they realize how grotesque their groveling to Inviso-Skydaddy really is, so they comfort themselves by imagining that everyone abases themselves before something
A squid's eye is nothing like a human's, it's a much better design. The cells in the retina of a squid's eye are attached to the optic nerve at the back, not the front as human retinal cells are. Therefore the squid has no 'blind spot' where the optic nerves leave the eyeball (as humans have).
Odd that an 'intelligent designer' gave the mollusk the premium eyeball and mankind a second-rate back-to-front model.
... since you cannot give the sequence of mutations that led to humans from apes
We're not far from that. We already know, for example, that humans and chimps have the exact same errors in same locations in the exact same non-working copy of the beta globin gene. Creationists might explain that God gave humans and chimps the same working globin genes because they have similar blood. But how do they explain God giving each animal a useless copy of one of the genes with the exact same mistakes in it?
Not only are they now making light of Darwin's ideas, now his hair cut too?
Most important parts of the human eye evolved before there were human beings.
Wrong on so many levels.
We know many of the genetic differences between H. s. sapiens and various other apes, including the chromosomal merge, the inactive genes, the flipped chromosome parts, etc. etc.
"hairyone"
"hairygod"
".and given the eye in a squid..."
"IMAMS of the hairygod darwin"
Hairyme hairyno hairyspeak hairyenglish.
Hmm... Should I try japanese?
How the fuck do you suppose we find out the sequence of mutations?! This actually requires the complete sequenced genome of every single generation of ancestors from the last common ancestor between humans and chimpanzees. This is an impossible standard of proof - only that of which someone completely ignorant of how molecular biology works would ask.
-Oh, and you owe me an irony meter for insulting Darwin by calling him a racist while thinking that comparing someone to a Muslim is an insult.
Bill's in the post, you racist little fucktard.
What's the hairyone? And who has faith in it? I'm supposing you mean either Darwin or satan, or maybe an execrable combination of them both. Laughable.
As for me, an atheist, I don't believe in satan or any other supernatural entities. I'd rather leave that to you and the others of your cult who do believe in any old nonsense. I definitely don't worship anyone either living or dead, that would be preposterous indeed.
While I am most certainly wrong sometimes, I am not a liar. Again, I'd rather leave all the lying and deceit to the people of your cult, after all, they are used to deception.
I do know that there is a factor about squid eyes that make them more sensible than human eyes, I've forgotten what it is. But I know that the information is readily available so I'll let you find it yourself. It's good practice for you of finding something out that's not in the bible.
That's what I have deduced from your quote which is, by anyone standard, a garbled mish-mash of disgruntlement, frustration and drooling stupidity.
So, because I am unable to perfectly explain how a piece of iron ore gets turned into a rocket, it is impossible to build rockets.
nice "logic" you've got there.
Calling Darwin a 'hairygod' is a bit hypocritical coming from someone who claims to believe in the god of Abraham, who's regularly portrayed with a beard you could hide a badger in.
Anyway, Leviticus 19:27 tells you not to trim your beard. It's right there just after the fundie favorite Leviticus 18:22 (the verse that tells you to kill homosexuals).
Say, you tell me who by, where, when, and in what circumstances each and every book of the Bible was written, with notarised accounts of witnesses to same, and then we'll talk. You want that kind of standard of proof ... well, so do I. Deal?
Oh, I think his call for a listing of all the mutations that were involved, is an allusion to Behe's current defence of his discredited 'irreducible complexity' idea.
In the cute turn of phrase of the author of the following link, "starving for support for ID, [Behe] was forced to eat his own brain-child, 'irreducible complexity'". In other words, the 'defence' is self-defeating.
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Calvin.cfm
Free tip:
Don't attempt to use insults that would be better suited to your own position in the argument. "hairygod darwin" suggests that evolution relies on the supernatural- you're actually trying to reduce the credibility of the opposing argument by suggesting it bears similarities to your own.
Also, "Imams?" Ignoring the obvious Muslim-bashing you fundies seem to love, this is, again, related to religion. As explained above, it's not a good idea to claim that the opposing argument has a religious motive in order to attack it, when your own position is a religious one.
Let's start with the simple fact, that we didn't evolve from apes. Now, let's leave it at that and let you chew on it for a while. Maybe then we can't begin to unravel more of evolution. I mean, if i live long enough for your competence.
Your requst is ridiculous because
1) Our current knowledge in genetics is not good enough to provide the information
2) To observe it in situ, we would have to sequence genomes from gonads of all dead creatures in the lineage of any single member of mankind. Not only we do not have enough fossils, but such sexual cells are gone and lost for a veeeery long time
3) You would not recognize a sequence of mutations even if it ran over you driving a bulldozer.
You want proofs of filiation : go out and learn something about mitochondrial DNA.
Evolution is not only real, the story is litteraly written inside your cells. Missing chapters do not prevent us to catch the big pictures.
Darwin , and Jesus both had beards.
look up human evolution and you will find lots of evidence about what changed. Its not like scientists make shit up over morning coffee.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.