[about flight 93]
It was shot down.
Why it was shot down is the real question. Perhaps the remote piloting controls were not working correctly and there was danger the plane could be brought down safely, exposing the busholini inc psyop.
8 comments
While people are looking for CT stuff on DU, there's lots more in the health scare lounge. And the 9-11 basement, but that's almost too easy.
I'd go look, but I have a headache, presumably brought on by my slow poisoning at the hands of the international soybean cabal and the shrinking of my brain due to my severe b-12 deprivation. ;)
Ok, if I'm thinking fo the same plane I do actually think it was probably shot down. I remember the news saying something about fighters being scrambled to intercept a plane, and I think it was that one. Later in the day the BBC was telling us the plane crashed because the passengers had deliberately made it crash. Seems a bit suspicious to me.
However, if there is some sort of cover up I'm actually ok with it as I can understand why they wouldn't want to admit to shooting down a passenger plane even though it was the right thing to do in the circumstances. And saying the passengers died heoricly gives the famillies comfort. Of course, the official story might actually be true, I've not bothered to investigate nor do I want to and my memory of the events in the media is less than clear.
But...that final paragraph. WTF?! What the hell is a "busholini inc psyop"? I have literally no diea what that means!
"Fuck you, asshole. The grieving families of all those aboard UA93 would like to have a word with you."
Why, you think they migth know something?
@Katsuro: The problem withthis, or most conspiracy theories is keeping them hushed up with a fairly large number of people. You have to scramble and fuel an Air Force jet, file a flight plan, ATC along the way would see the radar blip and see the echo of a missile going from it to the civilian craft, [and you would have to keep all of these people quiet after they saw hundreds of civilians slaughtered. Threats and intimidation work in movies, but not in real life. Nixon couldn't keep a simple break-in quiet, with only a handful of burglars.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
