Hitler was just following Darwin's script, that's what Aryan eugenics was based on. Its also why scientists used calipers to measure the heads of black people to try to determine they were intellectually inferior to whites in order to enslave them.
If we came from protoplasm, then abortion makes perfect sense. Its also protoplasm. If we are mutants from panspermia, jizz on a comet or a space rock colliding with fertile ingredients in mother terra firma, an accident, then there are no rules. There is no right and wrong. No intent. No purpose. No meaning.
And if that's the case, in this giant black F-hole of empty space, don't blame me for my actions in any damn thing I do any damn time I want, any way I want. You are just protoplasm too and in my way. Might makes right, in that world view.
Connect the dots.
35 comments
"Hitler was just following Darwin's script, that's what Aryan eugenics was based on."
Wrong! Darwinian evolution through the process of natural selection requires diversity in the gene pool. Hitler was going completely against that by trying to limit the gene pool.
Darwin's books were banned by the Reich and Darwin himself did not have very flattering things to say about racism, particularly after speaking to a black man that was kept as a goddamned zoo exhibit in Edinburgh.
Your rant boils down to: If I am not divinely entitled to act like a bastard and consider myself superior, then I'll act like an even bigger bastard just because.
Your sociopathy is noted punk, and society has no patience for it.
If we came from protoplasm, then abortion makes perfect sense. Its also protoplasm. If we are mutants from panspermia, jizz on a comet or a space rock colliding with fertile ingredients in mother terra firma, an accident, then there are no rules. There is no right and wrong. No intent. No purpose. No meaning.
Hitler failed the part of NATURAL selection, then, stupid. Oh, and Godwin; you lose!
Blacks and whites are just small variations in the same species, adapted to different levels of sun. Closer to the equator, the darker you are the better. Closer to the poles, the lighter you are the better. There is larger difference in intelligence between individuals than between different skin-tones.
Why would the origin have any bearing on behavior? The fact is that we do share a common ancestor with all life on Earth. Our society is what is due to evolution, nothing will change, as evolution has allways been "true". There IS right and wrong, bad behavior has always been frowned upon and those who behave worst have always been ostracized or killed, and not been allowed to procreate.
We WILL blame you for your actions, dumbass! You're part of society, aren't you? Then you'd better behave according to agreed-upon rules or you'll be ostracized or killed.
Adaptation makes right, stupid. If you can't adapt to fit into society, you won't be allowed to stay in society.
Actually, if Christianity is true, or at least the one practiced by many of the fundies we get on this site, then abortion makes perfect sense. By killing the baby, that baby has a 100% chance of going to Heaven and 0% of going to Hell*. Letting it live gives it a very small chance (1/3 of the world is Christian, but how many are RTCs?) of making it. So, in Wyatt's worldview, abortion saves souls and makes Jesus happy!
If the government is passing laws to prevent people who would otherwise reproduce in large numbers from doing so, then you don't have "natural" selection. Quite the opposite. Not to mention, evolution requires a large, diverse gene pool. And as some people have already pointed out, Darwin's books were banned in Nazi Germany.
*this depends on what the Church believes about original sin and salvation. If they believe in an "age of accountability", and that you have to "choose" Jesus to be saved, the baby just got a one way ticket to Heaven. If they believe, as my Missouri Synod Lutheran Church did, that every single person is tainted with original sin, and only those "elected" by the Holy Spirit will be capable of serving Jesus, then that baby's fate is unknown.
Maybe Hitler thought he was following Darwin's ideas, but that doesn't mean that the entire ToE is wrong. Hitler was also a vegetarian. Does that make vegetarianism wrong?
Godwin from the very first sentence. Why waste time?
> Connect the dots.
Okay.
You have been told by people you regard as leaders that the ToE is bad. They have also armed you with counterarguments in case you are asked to justify your belief.
Being biased toward agreeing with your community, you believe them without question. When others disagree with these community beliefs, you dismiss it out of hand. In fact, you might even believe that listening to them will poison your mind.
(am I getting the canned counterarguments right?)
You are aware that Darwin was throughly against slavery and the racism of the time, are you not? And no one can find a direct linkage between Darwin and the Holocaust? Just a lot of BS about Social Darwinism (which Darwin had nothing to do with).
In the end, all we have is the usual smear job against a great scientist. Oh, and if you feel the need to do any damn things you want, just remember the drones can be re-targeted quite easily.
"Hitler was just following Darwin's script, that's what Aryan eugenics was based on."
Hitler's Table Talk, July 25, l942:
'From where do we get the right to believe, that from the
"If we came from protoplasm, then abortion makes perfect sense. Its also protoplasm. If we are mutants from panspermia, jizz on a comet or a space rock colliding with fertile ingredients in mother terra firma, an accident, then there are no rules. There is no right and wrong. No intent. No purpose. No meaning."
Speak for yourself. I came out of my mother's cootch.
And... if we didn't have candles, the whole world would be pitch black! Your argument sounds stupid when you put it that way, doesn't it? For that matter it sounds stupid when you say it, too.
"scientists used calipers to measure the heads of black people to try to determine they were intellectually inferior to whites"
No. Granted, these people might have been considered scientists by the Victorian masses, but phrenology didn't last very long because those who actually used the scientific method of research were not impressed with it from the beginning. If you start with the assumption that other races and criminals are inferior, and therefore the shape of their heads must bear some indication of their cognitive abilities and personalities, that just ain't how science works.
"Hitler was just following Darwin's script"
image
So why was one of the books burned in Hitler's Third Reich "On the Origin of Species" by Charles Darwin? You FAIL.
"abortion makes perfect sense"
image
So why was abortion banned in Hitler's Third Reich? With long jail terms for the women concerned, and the doctors who performed such were executed. You FAIL II.
"And if that's the case, in this giant black F-hole of empty space, don't blame me for my actions in any damn thing I do any damn time I want, any way I want."
image
So why wasn't Hitler an Atheist ? :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler#Hitler_and_atheism
He was a Christian; a right -winger too. [/Reverse-Godwin]:
image [/url]
Why are so many Neo-Nazis pagan Wotan -worshippers today? [/paradox] You FAIL III Twatt Junker, and have struck out.
Nobody in their right mind, or even Hitler, used Darwin to justify killing people. In fact, many take the opposite attitude: if all of life is interconnected, we should try to avoid killing anything. Hitler's model wasn't Darwin; it was animal breeding, something that had been practiced for thousands of years before Darwin.
@Anon-e-moose
To paraphrase Hume, you can't get an 'ought' from an 'is'.
Nor can you get an 'is' from an 'ought' as this idiot is trying to do.
@nemo
Unless you're Catholic.
You are obviously too irresponsible to handle the freedom that comes with meaninglessness, you failure of an existentialist.
Natural phenomena do not in any way entail reasonable reponses unless you already have a goal in mind.
Is your goal to be of the superior race? Is your goal to have an abortion? Is your goal to explain things to idiots?
It makes all the difference.
Hitler banned both abortion and the teaching of evolution, you fuckwit.
#1597603:why did he want to ban Christianity and replace it with a new religion that had himself as the new messiah
He didn't. That's a complete myth that fundies invented to try and rebut Hitler's claim to Christianity. I'm not saying that Hitler was a good Christian but he believed himself to be.
@#1597603
"but to say he was a devout Christian is fundamentally wrong."
http://www.nobeliefs.com/Hitler1.htm
If what I said was 'wrong', submit my words for quoting here in FSTDT, then. [/bluff-calling] Go ahead. The only one stopping you - is you .
If you don't, then what I say is proved right . If you do, and it isn't quoted here, then what I say is proved right .
image
Your call.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
