Women who dress provocatively are showing worst inconsideration of men. They are selfishly feeding their ego at men's expense. Not only do they cause discomfort to men, but they cause men to lower their own morals because men will naturally pursue women when provoked and will go into an immoral mode to do this. Men's behavior is entirely different in a men-only environment versus when women are present, and the best moral behavior of men comes out only when women are not present.
Women, by nature, do not understand this and do not want to understand this. So giving women the power to vote over men is a recipe for disaster. I am for equality, but by this I mean separate equality. Women should rule/preach to women, never to men. And ideally men should only rule other men. The sexes should be kept separate outside the family as much as possible in order to promote general morality. And by this, I don't just mean sexual morality, I mean don't steal and don't kill. There is no doubt in my mind that the theft of the public treasury by the bankers of the western world is a direct result of feminism.
61 comments
It's weird how these woman haters actually end up degrading men more than women. For example, this asshole seems to think that men are nothing but sex robots who will screw anything that shows just a little skin. I love women who dress provocatively, but I don't want to have sex with every single one of them. And I certainly won't lower my moral standards just to get in the pants of those that I would like to have sex with.
The sexes should be kept separate outside the family as much as possible in order to promote general morality.
Move to Saudi Arabia. They're already doing that .
"Men's behavior is entirely different in a men-only environment..."
- Yeah, loveshy.com and Spearhead really bring out the best in men.
"Not only do they cause discomfort to men, but they cause men to lower their own morals because men will naturally pursue women when provoked and will go into an immoral mode to do this. Men's behavior is entirely different in a men-only environment versus when women are present, and the best moral behavior of men comes out only when women are not present."
There's this thing called self-control; fschmidt should look into it.
"...the best moral behavior of men comes out only when women are not present". You know what the conclusion of this argument is, don't you? Keep your women veiled and secluded at the back of the house like the Arabs do. Regard them as chattels and property. Jealously guard them and don't let them out of the house unaccompanied by a male.
"... the theft of the public treasury by the bankers of the western world is a direct result of feminism". That does not follow. How could the presence of women in the workplace make one more apt to steal? It's systemic, built into the system, not the result of one cause.
Women who dress provocatively are showing worst inconsideration of men. They are selfishly feeding their ego at men's expense. Not only do they cause discomfort to men[
]
I don’t know about you, but seeing pretty women is not causing discomfort to me, rather the opposite (if you know what I mean *nudge-nudge, wink-wink*).
[
], but they cause men to lower their own morals because men will naturally pursue women when provoked and will go into an immoral mode to do this. [
]
As TheSaucyAuto already said, there is this thing called self-control, maybe you should look it up.
[
] The sexes should be kept separate outside the family as much as possible in order to promote general morality. [
]
Fuck you, I will not give up my female friends!
[
]There is no doubt in my mind that the theft of the public treasury by the bankers of the western world is a direct result of feminism.
Wow, that came out of nowhere! Non sequitur much?
I have many male friend, colleagues and relatives. Only one treats me with sexual intent; my husband. All the others manage to treat me as a friend, colleague and/or relative.
IF men "will naturally pursue women when provoked" then that IS their own morals.
Here's a secret; women behave differently in a female-only environment too. There is more talk about make-up, dildos, clothes and female cramps, and a little less talk about ice-hockey, cars and power tools. I think we all benefit from being together; men tend to be more eloquent in female company and women often learn to be more assertive. (Which, on consideration, you probably hate with a passion...)
" Women who dress provocatively are showing worst inconsideration of men. They are selfishly feeding their ego at men's expense. Not only do they cause discomfort to men, but they cause men to lower their own morals because men will naturally pursue women when provoked and will go into an immoral mode to do this."
I'm a 25 year old frustrated virgin, and even I don't get the urge to have sex with - let alone rape! - every woman I see. Kinda blows your theory out of the water, eh?
I can certainly understand where you're coming from with that whole "I am for equality, but by this I mean separate equality."
I myself, after all, am for sobriety--but by this I mean drunken sobriety. I'm for peace, but by this I mean violent peace. I'm for happiness, but by this I mean sorrowful happiness...
"Not only do they cause discomfort to men, but they cause men to lower their own morals because men will naturally pursue women when provoked and will go into an immoral mode to do this."
Speak for yourself, creeper, the rest of us are perfectly capable of keeping our dicks in our pants.
First, let us quote with reverence Oliver Mellors, Lady Chatterly's gamekeeper: If folks would do their own fucking, they wouldn't talk a lot of clatfart about other people's. Secondly, a lot of men kept together are what is known as a brutal and licentious soldiery. They soon enough stink, in thought, word and deed. Third and last, why don't you move to Saudi Arabia?...
men will naturally pursue women when provoked and will go into an immoral mode to do this
Please, I beg of you, speak for yourself not me.
The college I attend is full of what you would certainly call women who "dress provocatively" and I haven't noticed the guys (myself included) act any less moral. Neither has my friend. Who went to Catholic school. You know, the kind with the strict uniform code.
As I man I find I have better self-control and respect towards others than this little gobshite thinks is humanly possible.
While I can see why many a woman finds this offensive, trust me ladies, these people are actually insulting men far more then they're insulting you, and the sad part is, they don't get it.
Then their morals are not very good, if a woman can make men change to immoral conduct.
Maybe women are of SATAN, and God meant men to have sex with an animal helpmeet ?
Its what the Bible implies.
Are these Islamic forums, because some Muslimas I know who come from conservatives families pretty much have these problems.
"Not only do they cause discomfort to men" If tits cause you discomfort as a man, you're probably gay. Also, the beach must be hell for this guy.
"but they cause men to lower their own morals because men will naturally pursue women when provoked and will go into an immoral mode to do this." Erm, o.k., look I have seen several female friends naked and didn't make a move so
either you're wrong or I'm gay, which I'm not so, you're wrong.
"and the best moral behavior of men comes out only when women are not present." Oh please stop, you're going to make me pee myself laughing!
Women who dress provocatively are showing worst inconsideration of men.
Gee, I always thought it was rather a gift. Did you maybe take a short jump over a tall fence?
I am for equality, but by this I mean separate equality.
So you're not for equality then.
There is no doubt in my mind that the theft of the public treasury by the bankers of the western world is a direct result of feminism.
Wait, what?
"There is no doubt in my mind that the theft of the public treasury by the bankers of the western world is a direct result of feminism."
what about when the jews did it though? women dressed pretty modestly back then. it's almost as if:
1) these bogeymen that always are corrupting and destroying the west are imaginary and so aren't influenced by relations between the sexes or women's fashion.
2) you're a fucking moron, and a psycho.
The usual sexist drivel "ohh! man would be perfect without woman around..."
but this bit:
"There is no doubt in my mind that the theft of the public treasury by the bankers of the western world is a direct result of feminism."
is so random it made me laugh :)
Saint Paul has just resurrected! Move over Jesus! Or is it the Prophet (peace be upon him)?
Men have responsibility in religion and law to take custody of their erotic responses.
The reference to women being to blame for the financial collapse is beyond time and space - and comprehension. Don't anyone bother trying to enlighten me. I'd rather remain in the dark on it.
This is entirely stupid, but really the end bit...
Because no one ever stole anything before feminism. Yeah. I got a bridge to sell you, fschmidt. If you can scrape together your allowance from living in mommy's basement that is.
They don't cause me any "discomfort."
Hell, one of the two biggest things that help me get out of bed in the morning is looking forward to meeting some "provocatively" dressed women.
The other is looking forward toward viewing those, and other, women with lust in my heart.
"Men's behavior is entirely different in a men-only environment versus when women are present,"
I work in a male-only career and I have found this to be very true.
"..... and the best moral behavior of men comes out only when women are not present."
I don't really think this is true at all. In fact the opposite is true.
Women: Don't listen to this idiot! It's very considerate of you to dress provocatively!
fshit: Dude, shut up! Don't spoil it for the rest of us who don't feel "discomfort."
The hardest part is looking while not having your wife notice.
Which is it fschshit, failing to understand or showing inconsideration to schmucks like you? How about neither-they dress the way they want to because they want to and couldn't give a shit what a creepy little woman hater like you thinks one way or the other?
Oh and Checkmate, nice impression of someone with English as a second language there. Not the least bit racist! </fucking sarcasm in case you didn't notice>
Funny, I'm perfectly able to control myself when around "provocatively-dressed" women.
Maybe it's because - unlike fschmidt - I'm not an evil, sociopathic, disgusting excuse for a human being.
The secret of a happy marriage is to become a devoted atheist. You will find that if you ignore all of Bible God's manic shills on Earth your married bliss will increase.
If you let Bible God into your life you and your partner will be forever terrified by provocative women. Come to think of it, you will both be terrified by women who are not provocative too. In fact, you'll be terrified by any woman who is not surrounded by kitchen.
All hail Lord Athe.
Since men do it freely and voluntarily, it can only mean two things. Either men are completely stupid and can't control themselves, or we live in a totally fucked up world. Or there is no free will. Either way, I don't see how women are the guilty part in the equation.
"Men who dress provocatively are showing worst inconsideration of women. They are selfishly feeding their ego at women's expense. Not only do they cause discomfort to women, but they cause women to lower their own morals because women will naturally pursue men when provoked and will go into an immoral mode to do this. Women's behavior is entirely different in a women-only environment versus when men are present, and the best moral behavior of women comes out only when men are not present.
Men, by nature, do not understand this and do not want to understand this. So giving men the power to vote over women is a recipe for disaster. I am for equality, but by this I mean separate equality. Men should rule/preach to men, never to women. And ideally women should only rule other women. The sexes should be kept separate outside the family as much as possible in order to promote general morality. And by this, I don't just mean sexual morality, I mean don't steal and don't kill. There is no doubt in my mind that the theft of the public treasury by the bankers of the western world is a direct result of the patriarchy."
What a boring world fschmidt is promoting...
"fschit, Religious Forums "
So, not taking into account your tl;dr (and who in their right mind would want to?! XP ), banned from Love-Shite.com, much?!
...or merely Attention Whoring yourself - and your inferior subhuman BS - elsewhere, to anyone else who you think will listen...?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.