I own 3 cats and 2 dogs. I love each one of them, each of them loves each other, and all of them love me. I do not get jealous if I see one of my dogs cuddling up to one of my cats. I do not get jealous if my dog wags its tail if approached and stroked by a stranger when I am out walking him.
When my pets are happy, I am happy, it is simple as that.
Best of all, I know that the love is genuinely unconditional, and not based upon the evolutionary urgings from my selfish genes within forcing me to replicate them through a particular chemically induced illusion called ‘love’.
I can’t think of a worse example to justify the selfish female paleolithic mating paradigm than the unconditional love for pets.
36 comments
Do you think there might be a bunch of female pet lovers out there?
I personally know they are there, and much more common than you'd think.
@Evgir Unslaad
I agree.
Also, the first part was nice but it quickly entered stupidville.
Sadly, this bozo is paired with that Scandinavian rape-apologist MPM guy.
I suspect the difference is because your affection for your pets is more like parenting than a pair bond. Not only are you comfortable with your pets loving each other and accepting affection from others (as you would with your kids), you have room in your own heart for more than one.
It is also true that some people have temperaments that are less monogamous towards partners. This isn't a problem unless it leads to violations of existing agreements, it just needs to be dealt with in an adult fashion.
I won't judge open marriages if you won't judge those which require fidelity.
It's simple really, how they get like this.
They <b>need</b> to fuel their superiority complex. It requires constant validation, or the underlying inferiority complex pops out and makes them feel bad.
To do this, they try to find new ways to articulate how their imagined inferior group(in this case women) are flawed, and they are not.
So they piece together that love is a chemical process that facilitates reproduction, and that this is crass and barbaric. Then in themselves, they uncritically invent a different kind of love, that somehow, in spite of being emotional and mental, isn't chemical.
They can't acknowledge it's the same, because then they wouldn't be <b>better</b>.
So. Okay. Women are all jealous and incapable of gaining happiness from seeing their loved one happy? And all this combined with "baby rabies" means they cannot be as loving a companion. Alright.
Note that Emma the EMO is the girlfriend of the creepy, self proclaimed former "incel," MRA, rape apologizing creepface who has several quotes on here. The anti-feminist is also a total creep, of course.
cdcdrr: Sometimes I feel like the only person in the world who has needy cats. If they don't get affection and attention they get very upset. Hell, one of my cats even gets sick due to stress if his favorite people aren't around.
Unconditional love... doesn't exist. Trust me, if you treated your pets like absolute crap, they would not love you. The dogs would be fucking terrified of you, the cats would most likely simply leave...
If unconditional love ever did exist, you would never hear of pets turning on their owners... so...
What you feel is "social bonding" love. We are social animals, and as such we need others to survive. Animals who like each other take care of each other, and animals who take care of each other survive longer. It is chemically induced, but it's not an illusion.
"selfish female paleolithic mating paradigm"? Whut?
Search statistics show that girls about 14 are the most searched for, mate.
In an internet survey in which men were shown pictures of females without being informed of their age, girls about 14 were rated sexually desirable the most often.
In one study men rated female faces about 13 years old the most attractive and other studies show similar results.
"Catch a Predator" usually use girls about 14 as bait because that's what draws the most men.
All of this is in agreement with what biology predicts about male preferences, mates
Where'd the weird fake Aussie come from?
""Catch a Predator" usually use girls about 14 as bait because that's what draws the most men."
Dude, it's not called Catch a Man, it's called Catch a Predator. They use 14 year olds as bait because that's what child predators go for. Men who prefer 13 year olds are not average men. But no duh they lurk about in the bowels of the internet and search for tweens. If the average man went for 14 year olds over women then they wouldn't be considered deviants, now would they?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
