I was watching a special on Animal Planet today. It was really cool. It was a mocumentary about dragons. It discussed the evolution of dragons starting from the cretaceous period up to their extinction 500 years ago.
As I was watching it though, I began to realize, that the very same techniques that these people were using to tell their story are the very same techniques that the evolutionists use to teach evolution. They take very limited information and make up the most incredible stories based on what they find. How come they can figure out exactly how dinosaurs lived 65 million years ago, including how they socialized, hunted, courted and mated all based on the sparsest evidence, but they can't solve a criminal case with the same amount of information?