You seem to not understand evolution theory at all, or you are attempting to change it's meaning to support the lack of transitional forms in the fossil record. This is a typical evolutionist game. [...]

Losing bones and regaining them, as depicted in the bogus example provided by evolutionists, is perposterous. It suggests that a group of bones suddenly appreaded in one new form, then dissapeared in another, then reapeared again. This is contrary to evolution the9ry because it represents a step bacward, not to mention the perposterous mutation causing numerous bones to appear suddenly in specific locations twice in the same animal line.

Furthermore, since mathematical theses has shown that not only is evolution mathematically next to impossible, the time required, according to researched frequency of mutations, means that this dissapearing and reapearing of bones is impossible.