you have a good point, scientists always jump to a conclusion.
For example, scientests find we have a "tailbone" which is vestigalent... wrong
40 comments
Aside from your horrific misspelling, you've botched the definition of "vestigal"; it just means we don't use it the same way we used to.
Um....I've broken it. I've seen the X-rays of the break. I've gone through the 6 months of pain and discomfort while it healed.do have a tailbone. If you don't believe that, then go have some biker kick you in the ass a few times until you hear a crack and are in intense pain. That was your "tailbone" breaking.
Not only do humans have a "tail", it's a faulty design left over from our four-footed days. Although it's angled further back in women, it still intrudes into the birth canal and sometimes has to be broken to get the baby out.
As a person who broke his "non-existent tailbone" falling out a swing at age eight, let me break this to you gently. You are a lying fuckhead with no knowledge of biology or anatomy what-so-ever, dumbass. Thank you.
lloydy89 has no knowledge of the scientific method, apparently. If you jump to a conclusion, how do you explain what you did in the article for a medical journal? How will the peer-reviewing people copy your work? How do you determine the falsifiability of a conclusion-jumping?
You don't need to be a "scientest" to find the tail-bone. It's right there; at the bottom end of the spine, and, as we don't use it to wag a tail, it's clearly "vestigalent".
“you have a good point, scientists always jump to a conclusion.”
“For example, scientests find we have a "tailbone" which is vestigalent... wrong”
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
