"What biased source? I wasn't citing anything, I used the Inverted World as an example of another point of view."
Here's what you said:
"Regardless of all the anti-white propaganda, you don't need to be sorry for your whiteness.
http://inverted-world.com/index.php/articles/articles/the_inverted_world/"
Use your mighty Aryan brain to figure this one out: if you are posting a link, you are using it as a reference, correct? What is a citation?
Dictionary.com
"ci·ta·tion
5.the act of citing or quoting a reference to an authority or a precedent."
"Education has little effect on IQ.
You're arguing that IQ is not inherited, so poverty of the past generations should be a non-issue to you. Right?"
Poverty has wide reaching effects such as malnutrition (which can hamper the development of the growing brain), a lack of education in the parents (which can lead to under-stimulation of younger children, seeing as with a lack of education, parents work longer to earn money and have less time to spend with their children to teach them things when they are very young, etc.). Raw brain power means nothing if it's not developed and nurtured, only in the rarest of cases do brilliant people come out of extremely impoverished families.
Poverty, which effects I.Q., has a much higher chance of being inherited(when you have nothing to pass on, you have nothing to leave to your children. A good education at home and at school doesn't pay for itself), than I.Q. itself.
"You know, the invention of paper, the first seismograph and guns, the number zero, etc."
Don't play the "what" game with me, we both know that "white" people didn't come up with those inventions first.
"I haven't read the book, so I don't know how right Murray is with the percentage."
Don't cite sources you haven't read.
"Why don't you think of it like this: If goverment attempted to keep it's citizens satisfied, people wouldn't be going around fighting the government."
All it takes is a minority of people to feel disenfranchised and to become belligerent to the status quo to get arms and fight against the government to cause widespread destabilization: (see Chechnya)
"You know, it's mentioned the Second Amendment. Apparently I was right about your stance on gun control, lol."
Let's look at the second amendment: "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Where does it say the government has to keep it's citizens in line by satisfying them? It only says citizens have the right to bear arms, it never specifies WHICH arms could be used.
"Well, maybe they sympathize with Nazi Germany. So what?"
It's dead treason against the state of Germany. Honestly, I think neo-confederates should be treated the same way: such stupid ideas have already nearly tanked both America and Germany.
