[In a discussion about revisions to scientific theory vs. literal adherence to scripture]
That is why there is no room for theories in science.
42 comments
"That is why there is no room for theories in science."
I'm not quite sure how you're completely unaware of this, but sience is founded on theories. I think you meant to say, "That is why there is no room for theories in religion."
There is plenty of room for theories, provided that they are backed up by empirical evidence. That's what you're sore about. Your creation "theory" has no evidence to back it up, so you get all pissy and whiny when the scientific community won't take it seriously.
FAIL ... to be funny, because he was joking ... or was he?
He wasn`t? Well he still fails but this time in a fun way.
Likelihood that this guy has ever passed a middle-school level or above science course: 0.000001%
Likelihood that this guy is a lobotomy patient: 23%
Likelihood that this guy doesn't know that words can have more than one meaning: 52%
Reading a pithy statement from someone who is clearly deluded by their own overconfidence: Priceless.
Science is filled with hypothesis, and theories. Some of which are hardcopy proven, unlike your bible with it's improbable tales, with only other incorrect books in the same bible as 'proof'.
If according to you there is no room for theories in science,so the theory of gravity doesn't exist, right? And that means I can push you off this cliff and I wouldn't be responsible for hurting you, right? Because gravity doesnt exist, right? Ok, come over here...
Oops, guess you were wrong; oh well.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
