I've posted a link many times in other threads to http://www.creationevidence.org/ this is a very useful site. You can also buy books on it if you want. I have one of their videos and they show that the only physical evidence for the evolution model is a pigs tooth they excavated..there was a trial over it as to whether it was mans ancestor and it turned out to be thrown out. They lost the trial. Scientists refer to this as though they won. So there is very little evidence.
22 comments
Hey Tabula, I saw a book once that said Jesus never existed. There was a trial over it and the Christians lost, but they keep pretending they won.
See, I can make shit up too!
Well, not everything Tabula said is a lie. There was a trial - the Scopes trial in the early 1900's - but that was a criminal trial against a teacher teaching evolution.
One of the many things Tabula is ignorant about is obviously the Dover School District's trial.
Anyone want to guess if that website says anything about it?
First, that is not by far the only evidence of evolution, second, the tooth was actually disproved by scientists. So yes, that was a win for science, it showed us that the peer review really does self correct itself.
I think the devs over at Tabula Rasa would be annoyed at your usage of their name.
Also, where do you get your info? If the 'only evidence' for evolution is a pig's tooth, where the hell did all these transitional fossils come from?
That Creation Evidence website is hilariously stupid. When you have a page saying that God must be omnipresent because we have variety everywhere, God must be "personal" because consciousness exists, and God must be loving and moral because love and morality exist, you are fast approaching the bottom of the barrel. You know you are finally there with its "10 reasons to believe the Bible" where 2 of the reasons are that it lasted, 1 is that the books tie into one another, 3 are about how people wouldn't be convinced of its extraordinary claims if it weren't true, 1 is about how some of its teachings are harsh and thus more credible for reasons unknown, and 1 more is, no kidding, that Jesus approved of them. Amazing stuff, there.
@Allegory for Jesus
Most of that fits the Spider-man run since '62. That's their idea of proof. How about Zorro, created in 1919.
I hate this practice they have of claiming an unqualified persons claim of something being looked at later by a more qualified researcher and found fraudulent or misinterpeted being a win for their side. The scientific community castes those examples out and in quick order, not your lot. The only reason you creationists have mistakes on record from the scientific community is because the scientific community keeps long term precise records.
Give me one example of a creationist discovering anything relative or disproving scientific consensus.
A clean slate indeed; your brain is totally empty, stupid.
I have a video of a short guy putting on a ring and becoming invisible. Absolute evidence that jewelry is magic.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.