“Tiny now your bording on the absurd, what's up?”
Oh, look who’s (kind of) talking.
“The Sun stood still in relation to it's normal obsreable movent in the sky. The sun rises and sets and if it stops midway it stands still based upon it's movements relating to the rising and setting.”
Isn’t it a key element to creationist dogma that the Earth is the IDEAL distance away from the sun? Part of that ideal is the rotation, so the sun doesn’t strike the same spot in the same way for very long. Just imagine if your car was in the parking lot for an hour of Noon, try touching the steering wheel.
So, if it stopped, either by the sun stopping or the Earth’s rotation stopping, the sun would become a spotlight on whatever time zone was in noon, right?
We would know about this today because there would be a spot on Earth’s equator that would resemble a plastic bowl used as an ashtray. Look like an oven mitt left on a burner right there.
"It has nothing to do with the specifics of each planetary revolutions or any other scientic notion.”
Well, yes, it really does. If the Earth is motionless and the sun travels around it, the entire universe circles around the Earth. That means the stuff farther away goes faster and faster until it exceeds the speed of light.
Also, the Earth spinning on its axis has a wobble. Not big, just enough to notice, to change the length of the day by milliseconds, but those accumulate. And the axis itself moves.
And if the ENTIRE UNIVERSE is what moves around the Earth, then that wobble is really hard to explain. Why do Distant galaxies replicate that wobble, and that motion, exactly the same as Pluto, but to a much greater scale?
It’s far easier to explain these motions if the Earth rotates and revolves around the sun.
“The Bible states the Sun stopped moving (or stood still) and nothing beyond that.”
This is the Bible that describes the Earth as a flat surface each and every time it comes up, right? Insists that the sky is solid, god walks around on it, and opens trap doors to let rain through?
Yeah, not terribly convincing, thanks.
“Yes, it is to be taken quite and specifically literal or at face value.”
But if the sun stopped for this battle, it stopped everywhere. And no one noticed. Or thought to write it down. Or tried to explain it, or blame it on a political foe. Or the Hittites. Seems unlikely.
“It is not a myth nor a fairy-tale nor an amalomation of other religious writtings.”
Okay. Then you have to justify it as a singular historical fact. You absolutely cannot hand-wave away the problems if it really happened.
If it’s a myth, fine, ignore all the connotations it would bring up.
But if it’s real, you have your work cut out for you.
“The Sun stood still on that day.”
Feel free to give anyone a reason to think this is true.
