“I don't understand, all of the Scientific evidence points, today, AGAINST Evolution,”
Citation desperately needed.
“in fact Scientists are getting away from traditional Neo-Darwinism, they're moving to Philosophy,”
Sure they are. Seven years to get a doctorate in biology, then take up a softer science for a career… Sure-sure.
"specifically a brand of Hinduism that teaches parallel universes, see the laws of this universe, we know now, cannot support evolution,”
So, what, we borrow laws from a different place?
You’re making less and less sense…
“IE can't get something from nothing,”
Ah, but, see, ACTUAL scientists know that this has nothing to do with evolution. And those same scientists know that this has nothing to do with the Big Bang. So they’re NOT motivated to take up hinduism. Or to abandon evolution.
You’re just lying. And poorly.
" so they are moving to different universes with different laws of science to explain it,"
No, they very much are not. because you’re to ignorant to lie convincingly.
“after all they can't simply say "In the beginning God", but they also can't defend Neo-Darwinism Scientifically”
Names. What are the names of some of these scientists you made up?
