spidermean2 #fundie

spidermean2 #fundie newsweek.washingtonpost.com

Evolutionists have no idea what is science. What they have are mostly fictional science. No bases whatsover. They have to understand first how DNAs form before they can speak about relationships.

59 comments

old comment by GigaGuess

That doesn't explain relationships. Bicycles share 100 percent of the materials they are built on with cars. The Windows operating system share 100% "materials" (magnetism) with Linux OS. They share the same basic science they are built on. The same science but no relationship whatsoever. They were built independently from each other.
Ignoring the colossal slap you just gave in the face of logic, you're wrong. Bicycles and cars are both modes of transportation, that fill different needs. One for speed, the other for efficiency. Same for Windows and Linux. Both are operating systems...just designed for different niches. So this is a rare example of a double fail.

Evolutionists have no idea what is science. What they have are mostly fictional science. No bases whatsover. They have to understand first how DNAs form before they can speak about relationships.
You say like you know the first thing aboutr genetics...particularly shown by the last paragraph of utter, colossal failure.

old comment by anonymous

"The Windows operating system share 100% "materials" (magnetism) with Linux OS"

Actually Linux can also be the electrons in a flash drive or the dye in a CD-R.

The OS itself is defined as the patterns in the data. The materials are totally irrelevant.

"The same science but no relationship whatsoever. They were built independently from each other."

Actually bikes and cars share a lot of engineering concepts, like tubular frames, and, you know, wheels.

"Evolutionists have no idea what is science."

Science is when you look at stuff, apply logic, and share the results.

"They have to understand first how DNAs form before they can speak about relationships."

No we don't.
Similarly, I can program in C++ with the SDL library even though I know very little about the G++ compiler, almost nothing about my computer's hardware, and I've never even bothered to look at the source code for SDL.

But does this stop me from programming rationally and making good programs? No.

old comment by Illuminatalie

I translated it to Russian and back again, then Korean and back again, and this is what I got :

That doesn 't explain the relationship. Bike is in excess of 100% car goes to 20. "Windows to 100% of the operating system; Linux OS with the material (his). Above the exit of construction of basic science. This process of science, but may be short. Each with a separate building. Evolutionists what science can not have any idea . often described as romantic, by science and what is it to you. whatsover no foundation. They talk about the relationship between the first period before the appearance of the DNAs will have to understand.
I think it makes more sense this way, that's just me though.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

"That doesn't explain relationships. Bicycles share 100 percent of the materials they are built on with cars. The Windows operating system share 100% "materials" (magnetism) with Linux OS. They share the same basic science they are built on. The same science but no relationship whatsoever. They were built independently from each other.

Evolutionists have no idea what is science. What they have are mostly fictional science. No bases whatsover. They have to understand first how DNAs form before they can speak about relationships."

Hoemskuled. much?

"Bicycles share 100 percent of the materials they are built on with cars"

Last time I looked, brakes on cars weren't made by Shimano.

"The Windows operating system share 100% "materials" (magnetism) with Linux OS"

Linux is as far removed from 2K, XP, Vista & W7 as spaghetti is from the Space Shuttle. And last time I tried, I couldn't pick up paperclips with my XP install disc.

"Creationists have no idea what is science. What they have are mostly fairtytales."

fixed

spidermean2 #fundie newsweek.washingtonpost.com

59 comments

Confused?