Assassination and British politics are not normally two things that go hand-in-hand. Although it is quite clear that this could change in the future, as the country comes to increasingly resemble Iraq or Somalia through the "enrichening" pr.ocess that is currently under way. For this reason, one has to be very skeptical about the recent supposed assassination of the EU-supporting British Labour MP Jo Cox.

Ms. Cox was stabbed and shot to death by a 52-year-old former psychiatric patient named Tommy Mair, who allegedly shouted “Britain first!” – also the name of a small but very active nationalist party. How very, very convenient!

Apart from a few politicians killed by the Irish nationalists and the IRA, political assassination is a desert in the UK, stretching back to the killing of Spencer Perceval during the the Napoleonic wars.

In other words, Britain, a country with practically no tradition of political assassination, has its first non-Irish related political assassination in over 200 years (let me know if I missed anybody) a few days before an earth-shaking vote that would have taken Britain out of the EU – and still could.

What makes this killing even more suspicious are the facts that the OUT vote recently overtook the IN vote and that the difference is narrow enough to be influenced by an act like this, especially if the media spin it in the right way, along the lines that OUT is “stoking up racism and hate,” obviously a factor with the soft, wobbly undecided voters who could swing it either way.

Another fact that points to a possible conspiracy is the fact that the victim was a relatively presentable and well-liked woman MP with few obvious negative points – apart, of course, from her support for the EU, globalism, multiculturalism, and the gradual genocide of the native British, negatives which she of course shares with most of the British ruling elite. In fact, I'd say she is in the top 5% of MPs in terms of likeability and ability to evoke generic sympathy, a very high "emotional quotient."

If it is an assassination designed to make Brexit look bad, then a lot also hinges on the choice of assassin. From what we have been told so far, the killer Tommy Mair is being presented as an addle-brained loner and loser with nationalist leanings, and reports of the actual event sound rather confused. But as someone who has undergone various forms of mild-altering treatments – drugs and therapy – for mental problems, Mair is also exactly the kind of individual who would be susceptible to being brainwashed to act as a Manchurian candidate.

With his house now in the hands of the anti-terrorist police and special branch, it should be easy to "find" additional evidence that he was radicalized by nationalists and/or the Brexit campaign as required. In fact, if such evidence is produced, it would be a major pointer to the fact that this was in fact a false flag attack designed to sway the result of the referendum.

When faced with cases like this, most sensible people’s natural inclination is to apply Occam’s razor and simply dismiss it as merely a random act of violence, but we live in an age when paranoia, even when technically wrong, still cuts closer to the underlying truths than the most strenuous rationalist approach.

The high emotional quotient of the candidate, the obvious attempt to shoehorn in a British nationalist narrative, and especially the rarity, timing, and utility of the event mean that there is plenty of room to see this as a false flag attack arranged by a conspiracy aiming to keep UK voters in line with the globalist agenda.

Likelihood of conspiracy 50/50