Top posts since
last month

www.jasonlionheart.substack.com

Jason #homophobia #transphobia #conspiracy jasonlionheart.substack.com

[Context: This is from a long post pretending to care about neurodivergent schoolkids so that he can use them to bash LGBTQ+ people]

A child who is constantly corrected but never fully understood will eventually ask a dangerous question: Why am I like this?

For a neurodivergent child, that question is not abstract. It is embodied. Deep in their flesh. It lives in the nervous system.

In today’s schools, there is an answer readily available.

Identity.

More specifically, LGBTQ identity frameworks.

These frameworks offer something powerful: permission to be different without apology. Language for distress. Moral protection. A story that explains why fitting in has always felt impossible.

For a neurotypical child, identity can be explored, revised, and discarded. It is flexible.

For a neurodivergent child, it can become totalizing.

It does not explain part of their experience. It explains everything.

And once it does, abandoning it feels like erasing the only coherent story they have ever been given.

[… more pretending to care about neurodivergent kids …]

The rise in transgender identification among children is not the root problem. It is a symptom.

It reflects a school system (amongst other factors) that cannot accommodate neurodivergence without trying to normalize it. A system that mistakes compliance for health and performance for wellbeing.

Until schools learn to recognize neurodivergence as something to be understood — not corrected — this pattern will continue.

Children will keep disappearing into labels because labels are the only place they are allowed to rest.

That is not inclusion.

It is institutional failure, and it is camouflaged and dressed up as care.

If schools applied the same rigour to understanding neurodivergence as they do to identity and LGBTQ+ awareness campaigns, fewer children would be driven toward ideology, self-harm, or medicalization as a way of making sense of unsupported nervous systems. Fewer parents would be left searching for answers in the dark.

Jason #transphobia jasonlionheart.substack.com

Dr. Paul McHugh, former psychiatrist-in-chief at Johns Hopkins, opens with the sentence that should have stopped this entire movement in its tracks:

“Should their psychological idea take precedence over the physical fact when they diverge? It’s as simple as that.”

Every single one of the elders at this table answers no—but each brings a different understanding of why.

McHugh brings historical memory: he watched the first gender clinic rise and fall. He shut it down when the evidence failed.

Bradley brings developmental insight: she witnessed children resolve dysphoria spontaneously when given time, support, and space to grow.

Zucker brings long-term outcome data: 80–90% of children desisted when not socially or medically transitioned.

Blanchard brings typology clarity: gender dysphoria is not one thing but multiple pathways with identifiable origins.

Levine brings adult psychiatric outcomes: surgery satisfies but does not heal; suicidality remains unchanged.

Van Meter brings endocrine precision: puberty blockers were repurposed from a specific medical condition into an ideological tool.

Lappert brings the scalpel: gender surgeries create dependency, not liberation.

Goldis brings the legal forecast: lawsuits are coming, discovery will be damning, and medical institutions will not survive what is coming.

What unites them is not ideology, but shared recognition that the psychological idea—”I was born in the wrong body”—was elevated into dogma without evidence, without caution, and without regard for the long-term consequences.

My reflection: In truth, what these elders are naming is a rupture in our cultural spine. We traded discernment for deference, complexity for simplification, and human development for ideological certainty. When elders across disciplines converge on the same warning, we are no longer dealing with a debate—we are dealing with testimony. And testimony requires us to listen not with defensiveness, but with moral courage.