Siouxweety (bite me!) #fundie

Siouxweety (bite me!) #fundie fstdt.com

I do realize that abortion was available for decades, but I had never until now seen a more extreme stance by an American president on this issue, until now.
How many people here know that Muslims want world domination?
How do you think they will achieve it?
They are a very real threat.
They also follow the teachings of a man named Mohammad who happened to be a pedophile.
So, in reality, they are condoning statutory rape and mistreatment of women and children, which is very deplorable.

55 comments

old comment by smartz

The same can be said bout Christians, killing people who thought they were witches, eliminating thousands of Muslims during the Crusades for no other reason than they were not Christian, the Spanish Inquisition where they tortured and executed people those who wouldn't convert into Christians...

Please, do go on with your paranoid delusion of Muslims taking over the world. The only Muslims that really posed a problem to the world are the extremist Muslims, who are much akin to fundamentalist Christians, taking the Koran literally and using it to justify their every immoral deed.
No one is forcing you to have an abortion, so honestly, it is not your business if another woman decides to abort a child, let it hang on their conscience and stop getting so personally involved.

old comment by D Laurier.

So a rant against abortion that imediately becomes a spewing of anti islamic hate mongering.
Wow.

"I do realize that abortion was available for decades, but I had never until now seen a more extreme stance by an American president on this issue, until now"
Huh? What are you talking about?

And now for a total non-sequitur

"How many people here know that Muslims want world domination?"
As many as know that Hindus want world domination.... So only you.

"How do you think they will achieve it?"
By converting to a religion that has a global domination requirement?
And then building the largest navy and airforce in the world?

"They are a very real threat."
To what?

"They also follow the teachings of a man named Mohammad who happened to be a pedophile."
Sorry no, they dont.
They follow the teachings of a man named Mohamed. There is no "peadophile" ivolved

"So, in reality, they are condoning statutory rape and mistreatment of women and children,"
In which reality? Certainly not the one we earth people live in.

"which is very deplorable"
You mean like making up hatefull lies about persecuted religions that you are obsessed with destroying?

old comment by Papabear

"I do realize that abortion was available for decades, but I had never until now seen a more extreme stance by an American president on this issue, until now."

Extreme? Even so, so what?

"How many people here know that Muslims want world domination?"

Even if that were true, so what? Muslims seem no more bent on world domination than Christians... though they both seem bent to me.

"How do you think they will achieve it?"

Breeding and violence? though they'll have to really get busy to out breed Mormons, Catholics and deep-end evangelicals.

"They are a very real threat."

All fundamentalist religious persons are threats.

"They also follow the teachings of a man named Mohammad who happened to be a pedophile."

Moses was a murderer. David was an adulterer and a murderer. David and Solomon had hundreds of concubines. Jesus was delusional. Paul was a liar. Do you see the problem?

"So, in reality, they are condoning statutory rape and mistreatment of women and children, which is very deplorable"

Your Bible condones slavery, selling ones own children into slavery or prostitution, burning one's daughter to death, killing one's son, genocide, etc. Not deplorable?

old comment by Shann

@ EvoPagan: Absolutely. The fact that they still use it as justification for selling off underage girls sickens me. Girls and women are nothing but another possession/commodity to those people.

@ D Laurier: If you think that Mohammad having sex with nine year old Aisha isn't pedophilia, you're delusional. Your timeline is a little screwed up too. How could he be dead for raping Aisha long before he even met her? He not only married and raped a child, he rather conveniently justified breaking the laws of his own religion by marrying too many girls then claiming (also rather conveniently) that allah had told him it was okay. No one needs to make up lies or slander Mohammad. The truth is ugly and disgusting enough, no embellishment is necessary.

old comment by Horsefeathers

"I do realize that abortion was available for decades, but I had never until now seen a more extreme stance by an American president on this issue, until now."

Extreme because it's different than your own, right?

"How many people here know that Muslims want world domination?"

Yes, Muslims want World Domination. All of them. Every last one. They hold secret meetings about it on Tuesday nights. New Muslims are given their very own decoder ring after three consecutive meetings and a complete background check.

Seriously, Muslims aren't after world domination you jackass. Tighten up your tinfoil hat just in case though.

"How do you think they will achieve it?"

The same way the Illuminati will. Or the Zionists. Or the Freemasons. Or any number of other groups that supposedly want to take over the world.

"They are a very real threat."

Some of them that hold extremist views are. That, however, can be said of any group who has members with extreme views. Yes, even Christianity.

"They also follow the teachings of a man named Mohammad who happened to be a pedophile."

So? You follow teachings in a book supposedly inspired by the greatest mass murderer ever recorded.

"So, in reality, they are condoning statutory rape and mistreatment of women and children, which is very deplorable."

So does your Wholly Babble. Look it up.

old comment by Cobby Moggy

"How many people here know that Muslims want world domination?"

Says the fundie who loves to look at herself in the mirror.

"I do realize that abortion was available for decades, but I had never until now seen a more extreme stance by an American president on this issue, until now."

Yes of course, because all non-Muslims will now have abortions just for the fun of murdering babies, and each Muslim family will now have 25 children each so Al-Qaeda can acheive world dominion.

Right.

As I recall he is personally against it, but he isn't going to take the choice away from someone else. Not very extreme at all.

And somehow, according to fundie logic, this is more evidence that he is a secret Muslim.

So, in reality, they are condoning statutory rape and mistreatment of women and children, which is very deplorable.

No, fundie bigotry is deplorable.

old comment by Hazor

EvoPagan
"And I'm tired of people making excuses for Muhammad's pedophilia. It's wrong no matter the time period or the place, and yes, there ARE areas of the Middle East where very young girls are forced to marry adult men and they ARE raped and everyone around them DOES condone it, and it all goes back to Muhammad raping Aisha at age 9. Let's not try to put a pretty face on it, ok?"
Quoted for truth. Yeah, it was acceptable back then, but I don't see how that means we should condone his having done it. It's like saying we should condone slavery because it was at one point commonplace in the U.S. and several presidents had slaves.

#959018
"How many of you people realize that Muslims oppose abortion, gay rights, sex before marriage, and most of the other things that Christians oppose? Why exactly are these two religions not working together?"
Because Christians are American. Muslims are anti-American because a few of the extremist ones wanted to kill Americans. America, F*** YEAH!!~~!
Srsly. I may only know one Muslim, but she's probably one of the nicest, most pacifistic persons I've ever met.

old comment by solomongrundy

Mohammad who happened to be a pedophile

How old was Mary when she married Joseph? I'll play Devil's Advocate here.

Between twelve and fourteen probably. That was the age you married off your daughters in that culture. Joseph was a widower, at least eighty-nine years old, old enough to be considered infertile, hence the virgin birth (although 'virgin' is probably a mistranslation).

When forty years of age, Joseph married a woman called Melcha or Escha by some, Salome by others; they lived forty-nine years together and had six children, two daughters and four sons;.. (my edit, years pass)...a respectable man to espouse Mary, then twelve to fourteen years of age... (my edit again) St. Joseph was an old man at the time of marriage with the Mother of God.

That's all from the Catholic Encyclopedia, none of it is quote mined. Google it for yourselves.

Christians have no liberty to call Mohamed a paedophile when Joseph was no better.

old comment by Giveitaday

I do realize that abortion was available for decades

You have an amazing grasp of the obvious. C'mon everybody, let's give Siouxweety a round of applause for realizing something that has been common knowledge for decades.

but I had never until now seen a more extreme stance by an American president on this issue, until now.

And what is so extreme aout Obama's stance in relation to any other presidents? Obama has not, nor does he have the power to, change any rules, regulations, or laws that pertain to abortion.

How many people here know that Muslims want world domination?

No one. Islam, like Christianity, Judaism, or any other religion you can think of, is a social grouping of individuals, not a hive mind. Islam has no hierarchy, and not all muslims have the same motives or goals, and like all other religions Islam is also fractured by it's own internal schisms and doctrinal differences. Muslims don't share an ideology of world domination any more than christians, hindus, or jains do. And to claim otherwise just go's to show the folly of you ignorance.

How do you think they will achieve it?

Simple. They won't. Nor are "they" trying to. There is no "there" there.

Your mentality is frighteningly similar to that of Pre-WWII Geremany, where the propagandists claimed that all problems of society had their root in international jewery, and every societal problem was just another step in a jewish scheme of world dominiatian. You and your kind have ressurected the mentality of that era and pointed it towards Islam.

They are a very real threat.

To who? Last time I checked it was the US Military and NATO that was in the middle east conducting aerial bombings and threatening to invade other muslim countries (i.e. Pakistan & Iran). Last time I checked it was fundamentalist christian chaplains that were calling for soldiers to "hunt people for jesus" and giving lectures to Afghani warlords about how "only christianity can provide a safe and civil democratic society". So please tell me who's more of a threat to who's civilization? Terrorist attacks, while each and every one tragic, are not a threat to western society as a whole, or to your religion.

If anything could be classified as a threat them it would have to be the growing anti-intellectualism and anti-science in the ranks of fundamentalist branches of many religions that wishes to drag civilization back into the dark ages, as if that were a good thing.

They also follow the teachings of a man named Mohammad who happened to be a pedophile

So? Pedophilia isn't a tenet of islam. You can't judge a whole society by the actions of it's founders. What Mohammed may have done does not mean that all muslims are therefore guilty of that same offense, or even agree with it.

So, in reality, they are condoning statutory rape and mistreatment of women and children, which is very deplorable.

Yes it is deplorable. It's also condoned by many branches of christianity right here in the US. Frankly it seems the height of arrogance to think that you must cleanse another society of percived wrongs when you can't even clean up your own backyard.

And while deplorable it still does not give you or anyone else the right to take over their society and change them by the barrel of a gun. Enlightenment cannot be forced upon any population and attempts to do so only lead to resentment and subsequent rejection of the priciples of enlightenment.

old comment by GigaGuess

So, in reality, they are condoning...mistreatment of women and children...

This is rich. A woman stands to do something other than hide in her home, and crank out babies as is the Godly way, and the fundies scream murder about how women should know their place. And then they have the nerve to call down the Saudis for their mistreatment of women...why? Because they don't make women wear burqas (But still insist they cover as much of their sinful flesh as is humanly possible...)? Because their views are legislated? Christ, if the fundies here had their way, it'd be Iran 2.0. They have very little room to harp on them about these things. And about the children, lest we forget The Pearl's Guide to Godly Child Abuse...

old comment by Marlowe

"How many people here know that Muslims want world domination?"
How many people here know that Siouxweety was born with male and female genitalia? If you didn't, it's probably because, like the above, it's a completely baseless claim.
"So, in reality, they are condoning statutory rape..."
Like Congressional Republicans when they hushed up Mark Foley?
"and mistreatment of women..."
Like when John McCain opened with the kneeslapper "Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno"?
"and children,"
Like when Michelle Malkin stalked a preteen for speaking out in favor of expanded healthcare?
"which is very deplorable."
Which is why I'm sure you condemn everyone listed above.

old comment by Siouxweety

You people really need to get over the fact that despite what you may think, there are other people in this world that may not think the same as you do.
I was watching the news earlier and someone suggested that the detainees at Gitmo should have been killed and then we would not have all these legal problems.
I agree 100 percent.
As for Obama, he is exerting too much control and it is going to come crashing down on him. He has not helped matters, he has made them worse.
Some of us don't trust the president, and feel that he does mnot serve our best interests, and his questionable past would picque the interest of anyone who has the ability to think.
Now, having said that, do you feel great inside that you can sit here on a site and call me names?
If so, I suggest you go and get a life.
Liberals are supposed to be open to other's ideas, not just their own. So I suggest you change your name to "we"berals.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have a life to lead.
Oh yeah, O, if you're such a man then why don't you accept my challenge to come to my face and say the things you do?
Oh yeah, I forgot, you're a wuss.
Tee hee!

old comment by POSW

You people really need to get over the fact that despite what you may think, there are other people in this world that may not think the same as you do.

After you.

I was watching the news earlier and someone suggested that the detainees at Gitmo should have been killed and then we would not have all these legal problems.

No, we would have more legal problems. I'm talking about the Geneva Convention here.

I agree 100 percent.

Bloodthirsty, aren't you?'

As for Obama, he is exerting too much control and it is going to come crashing down on him. He has not helped matters, he has made them worse.

Oh, the wonderful, wonderful irony. Republicans were the ones who wanted a powerful executive branch when Bush was in power. Now that Obama is President, executive power is suddenly BAD and needs to be limited. If you don't see the irony there, you're not looking.

Some of us don't trust the president, and feel that he does mnot serve our best interests, and his questionable past would picque the interest of anyone who has the ability to think.

Questionable past - such as being the first black president of the Harvard Law Review?

Now, having said that, do you feel great inside that you can sit here on a site and call me names?

Actually, yeah. It's nice to know that there are people out there who are dumber than I am.

If so, I suggest you go and get a life.

I've got one. It's pretty good right now.

Liberals are supposed to be open to other's ideas, not just their own. So I suggest you change your name to "we"berals.

Hat toad hamster? Violin caribou?

There, I just made less sense than you. I win the nonsense contest.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have a life to lead.

No, really? I thought you were dead!

Oh yeah, O, if you're such a man then why don't you accept my challenge to come to my face and say the things you do?

Because I don't know who the hell you are, and frankly, I don't care.

Oh yeah, I forgot, you're a wuss.
Tee hee!

I'm 5' 6". I have a right to be a wuss.

Besides, only ignorant meatheads think that fighting resolves anything.

Siouxweety (bite me!) #fundie fstdt.com

55 comments

Confused?