"If we incorporate caamib's idea that having sex with prostitutes would not be considered premarital sex nor would it be impeded by a ban on women working... then wouldn't all women just become prostitutes?
Follow my train of thought for a moment: Cat's Paw's proposals make marriage unpleasant for women. "
Yeah, I was amazed by your conclusion that women would just want to become prostitutes and decided to gave you a chance. I tried to follow your thought further but stopped reading when I got to the part where you claim his ideas make marriage uncomfortable.
Somebody who'd say that has no idea how women work. Women just go for what's the current norm in society and feel comfortable when they do that.
Sucking frat cock and being worthless scum isn't the natural state of women, nor is it being good wives and mothers. Women just adjust to what's popular in society.
"Two: Semantics nothing, these are the very definitions of words. Why not just admit you don't think shit through instead of going into a series of increasingly ridiculous excuses that always ends up with you making a claim so impossibly absurd that you never live it down. "
I am still waiting for you to make an argument. So far your only argument is "but prostitutes are also workers and therefore all of your arguments are baaaad!". Ok, I'll give you a chance...
"Three: Even if you got your heads out of the alternate dimensions you've got tucked away in your assholes where the world works based on some alien logic hostile to the reality the rest of us humans here on Earth are used to and tried to set this bullshit up in a manner that somehow technically works despite the contradictions and mutually exclusive initiatives how the hell would you even enforce something so laughably convoluted and easily exploited for purposes contrary to your insane intentions? "
1. How is it convoluted and whatever you say?
2. How it would be enforced? The same way all sane cultures, from Ancient Athens/Rome to early America did. It's pretty easy once people wake up.
"The abolition of privacy laws alone"
Some things I wanted to point out regarding cat paw's suggestions are that some of these would actually be redundant.
If you do the essential things like ban women from voting and working and make adultery and pre-marital sex illegal you would no longer have any need for slut shaming or things like that. Women would just accept a sane culture.
So I am not sure what cat meant by "abolish privacy laws", probably not all of them, but it would ultimately be irrelevant. See my post to the person above.
As for my "doxxers", lololololol. What cat's paw didn't mention in that post is that in a sane culture there would likely be none of those tactics on the Internet at all. It would be a civil society since seducers would be destroyed.
And regarding the comment on what women feel as uncomfortable, do you think women naturally want to be raped by niggers, have bullets in them and want to be impregnated by animals who will never take care of the kids?
Of course not.
But, at the same time, no more do they want to be good mothers and wives who will marry chaste and be decent wives.
Women are what you make of them in a society created by men.
If a society created by men is bad women will be bad. If a society created by men is good women will be good.
If you see the amount of men defending what is the death of any society, an atrocity like women's suffrage, you'll see that this society is dead.