Here's the thing: Just because some liberals in media have become complete rationalists, it doesn't disprove the spiritual realm! All believers in Christ acknowledge that the spiritual realm and spiritual entities are present day realities. To even believe in God requires the acceptance of a spiritual being. So, for the media to attack Palin is to attack the 97% of American's who believe in God.
25 comments
Here's the thing: Just because some liberals in media have become complete rationalists, it doesn't disprove the spiritual realm!
Yes, fine.
All believers in Christ acknowledge that the spiritual realm and spiritual entities are present day realities.
Yes, also fine.
To even believe in God requires the acceptance of a spiritual being.
This is fine too.
So, for the media to attack Palin is to attack the 97% of American's who believe in God.
Here is where you fail.
As much as I hate to admit, merely believing in a higher power does not automatically make you as big a fundtard as Sarah Failin'.
For the media to attack her is for them to attack a small fringe of nutty rapturists, who never leave the house unless they think Jesus is coming to get them.
It is always interesting when the christian fundamentalists cannot decide whether they are a small persecuted minority within the USA, or a huge group that makes up 97% of all christians ;)
Here´s a small hint, Douglas:
97% of American's
It's "97% of Americans "!
Wow, I get to use the same refutation twice in one day!
If we're going to talk polls:
http://www.yesnogod.com/
So that would be the 46% of Americans who believe in God. And as others have pointed out, your particular version is a fraction of that. You're a tiny minority. Now stop making such a noise and disturbing the grown-ups.
Nuh uh. I think the statistic is 97% claim to believe in a higher power. Shocker - most of those do not believe in your vindictive, misogynistic, psychopathic and angry god.
[So, for the media to attack Palin is to attack the 97% of American's who believe in God.]
Bullshit. 97% of Americans aren't running for the Vice-Presidency .
Rightees have been vigorously attacking Obama's faith all along. Now you're saying that Palin's faith is off-limits? I call hypocrisy.
"Just because some liberals in media have become complete rationalists, it doesn't disprove the spiritual realm!"
"All believers in Christ acknowledge that the spiritual realm and spiritual entities are present day realities. To even believe in God requires the acceptance of a spiritual being."
"So, for the media to attack Palin is to attack the 97% of American's who believe in God."
I'm a liberal in media. Just because some people aren't rationalists provides no evidence for the existence of a "spiritual realm." Burden of proof's on the one making the claim, genius.
As for Palin: Joe drives a Ford. Joe robs a bank. Joe gets arrested for bank robbery; is this an indictment of all Ford drivers?
If you want to construct a syllogism, first learn to spell it. Then learn what it is. Then apply it to reality, not your fevered imagination.
Then STFU, because you're obviously too dumb to say anything worthwhile anyhow.
Sarah Palin gives small town people a bad name.
The media doesn't need to attack Palin she attacks herself by opening her mouth.
So, for the media to attack Palin is to attack the 97% of American's who believe in God.
I understood is was much less. Somewhere in the 80s. Making shit up for Jesus.
Who the Hell is "attacking" Ms. Palin? They are called "questions". She's been served nothing but scripted softballs and still comes off as an idiot.
Ms. Palin, to any objective observer, is fundamentally: dishonest, ignorant, dogmatic, vindictive,reckless, partisan, primitive, delusional, aggressive and incurious. All of these traits are well documented, her public record reads like a bad fantasy novel, and any one of those is disqualifying in my estimation.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
