Ali Sina calls Muhammad a pedophile because he married the 9-year old Aisha when he himself was 54! I have no problems believing it. But what I don't understand is why we are insulting Muhammad for a having a mental disorder called pedophilia? Was he himself responsible for having this disorder? According to psychology texts, mental disorders generally happen in a person without his/her consent and in most cases without his/her knowledge as well. So did he really know he had a mental disorder? Even if he did, then what? Surely we can't blame anyone for his mental or physical sickness or can we?
[2 posts later]
Just to let you know, a person can have thoughts about molesting children, thoughts about having sex with them or he may actually commit these acts in real still WITHOUT being a pedophile. DO you doubt? I guess you should read your favourite DSM-IV again. And I think we would all agree on one fact: Pedophile usually act on their urges a lot sooner than turning 54. Don't you think?
[next post]
What if pedophilia is legalised in Germany in 50 years? I mean we see gay marriages being legalised across the world, which was unthinkable (and still is in most countries of the world) only a decade ago! So what if pedophilia is recognised as a condition rather than a mental disorder in 50 years?
31 comments
I don't see this as fundie.
However, it does strike me as unbelievably sick and twisted (and not in a good way).
~David D.G.
What if pedophilia is legalised in Germany in 50 years? I mean we see gay marriages being legalised across the world, which was unthinkable (and still is in most countries of the world) only a decade ago! So what if pedophilia is recognised as a condition rather than a mental disorder in 50 years?
Things that were "unthinkable", say, 100 years ago:
-Interracial marriage.
-Women voting.
-Equal rights to minorities.
-Heart Transplants.
-The computer/television/etc.
Don't try to pull that "unthinkable" crap. Just because an idea is just now being accepted doesn't mean it's wrong. In fact, it usually means the opposite and that we're becoming a more tolerant society. Nice try.
1) Pedophilia is DEFINED as having a sexual attraction to prepubescent children, so yes, 'just' having the thoughts classes you as a pedophile (note that I say "you", sick fuck).
2) The thoughts themselves may not be the person's fault, but acting on them certainly is. All child molesters are pedophiles, but not all pedophiles have to become child molesters -- they CAN resist the urges if they have a conscience and seek help.
3) The difference between pedophilia and gay marriage is simple: Adult homosexuals are capable of consenting to sex and marriage. A child is not. Unless the entirety of the human race suddenly morphs into sociopaths, pedophilia will never be legal, and an adult marrying a child is certainly never going to be accepted.
So what if pedophilia is recognised as a condition rather than a mental disorder in 50 years?
That still dosen't make it ok. No amount of your pedophilia apologist fuckery will ever, ever make it ok.
And your posts beg the question, Is your pedophilia apologist act for Muhammad or is it just a roundabout way of justifying it for yourself?
And last but not least, Go die in a fire you sick fuck!!!
Mohammed was in a culture where that was acceptable and in a time where people reached maturity (socially and sexually) earlier than they do today, due mostly to the kinds of responsibilites thrust upon them and the necessity to breed early and often. Kind of hard to diagnose him as a pedophile by today's social standards, when we only know it as such in an industrial era.
Besides that point, pedophiles will probably not be given rights to marry prepubescent children unless we first make it possible for people of that age and maturity to enter into legally binding contracts. Probably not going to happen due to the massive chance that they are uninformed and would be exploited by the other party, or by third parties. I don't know what your motivation was for positing that particular slippery slope...but it is still a failure.
Wait, wait, wait. According to your argument, a person with a mental illness doesn't really have a mental illness unless he or she believes that he or she has a mental illness. Do you see a disconnect here?
Mohammed was in a culture where that was acceptable and in a time where people reached maturity (socially and sexually) earlier than they do today,
Not true. Girls would get the menarche at 12-13 in medieval ME, check this site: http://www.mum.org/menarage.htm
Furthermore, it was never normal for an old man to marry a little, prepubescent girl. People married young, that's true, but they were the same age and already in puberty, at least in their teens.
Also, Mo is the Uswa Hasana according to the Koran, the best example to follow for all times.
I usurped god.
2) The thoughts themselves may not be the person's fault, but acting on them certainly is. All child molesters are pedophiles , but not all pedophiles have to become child molesters -- they CAN resist the urges if they have a conscience and seek help.
Actually, no.
Child molesters are opportunistic predators that are not necessarily pedophiles. Most of them have no particular attraction to children and would also take advantage of mentally challenged adults if given the chance. Anyone who can be overpowered and manipulated into silence is fair game to them.
But what I don't understand is why we are insulting Muhammad for a having a mental disorder called pedophilia?
Assuming that to be true, and Mohammed to be irresponsible for his creepy, paedophilic actions, we're more concerned about all those people who, rather than stopping him, held that fucker up and continue to hold him up as a beacon of morality and virtue.
If he was a pedophile, he was not responsible for the disorder, but he was responsible for acting on his disorder.
I think he was just a man of his time, and that women were just property back then, to be used as the owner wanted.
Was Aisha definitely the first child he had sex with? It might have happened a lot over the years, but as I said, women were property, and children as well, so no-one probably did bat an eye, as long as he had adult sex as well.
Homosexuality, just like heterosexuality, concerns adult attraction and consenting sex. It can't be compared with child-molestation, which is neither adult nor consensual. Children can't give informed consent, so it doesn't matter whether the adult has a condition or a mental disorder. The moment he or she moves in on a child, it's no longer just his/her problem, but the molested child and its parents are also involved.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.