“The earth is NOT 4 billion years old.”
And do you have evidence of this or are you just fixating on a book of tall tales?
“ Neither is the universe.”
Same question…
“ Give it up. All methods of dating presuppose conditions of autocreation that could not have ever happened.”
No, i really don’t think that dendrochronology depends on the Earth being more than 6000 years old. I don’t think ANY of them do, but i can’t see how a literal reading of Genesis changes counting tree rings.
“The universe was created with radiation levels more or less where they are today.”
How does that affect the dating methods that do not use radiation?
How is it that this is true AND radiation-based dating methods match up with non-radiation methods?
“If you created Bullshittium yesterday”
Ah. A rational approach by someone willing to demonstrate that he knows and understands the theory…
“ with a radiation level of 10 kornturds, and a radiation level of 10 kornturds indicates that Bullshittium is at 80% of its effective life,”
That’s not how radioactive dating works you blithering idiot.
“it doesn't mean you didn't create it yesterday.”
Considering your analogy is just tremendous ignorance, you can’t possible say what it means.
“When your caculations asssume a process that has no relation to what happened, then your calculations have no chance of being accurate.”
You don’t even know what the calculations fucking ARE.
Shut up before you hurt yourself, poking that log in your eye.
