Well science is in alot of ways proving the bible correct...and other science is TRYING to disprove the bible... ha ha disprove... like... it was cold back then is Jesus walked REALLY on ICE... HA... Science is stupid...
36 comments
Nice! I always wondered how he did that. Kinda takes away the miraculous part, though, doesn't it? And are we to assume the fishermen were ice fishing, then?
So when a scientist acknowledges the existance of the bible, as in, "The christian bible is a collection of fairy tales," that counts as 'proof' of some sort? I don't get it.
Do you know what Science means?. Man, they try to explain how the world works. The key is that, whether they discredit the Bible or not, it´s not their business.
Science has so far proved that a bat isn't a bird, that the world is round, that the moon isn't a source of light, that Creationism is a pot of bullshit, that the earth goes around the sun etc. etc. So, it's proven quite a few things in the Bible wrong.
Well science is in alot of ways proving the bible correct and other science is TRYING to disprove the bible.
True, there are people actively trying to diproof the bible, and when I hear about their successes you know that I was correct in thinking the bible is just another book.
And the rest of the scientists are just doing some random research into the field of their interest and sometimes that proofs the bible wrong. Just live with it.
I read about that paper proposing that a freak cold snap would have made it possible for there to be ice on the water that could have supported a man, enabling Jesus to "walk on the water."
The Bible is a morality play. Events happen for narrative reasons rather than scientific ones. Bits like "I saw men like trees, walking", which resonate surprisingly well with modern discoveries, are interesting to look at, but it's the laws of narrative rather than physics that shape the story.
I'm reminded of an old joke my mother told me when I was a kid:
"Well science is in alot of ways proving the bible correct...and other science is TRYING to disprove the bible... ha ha disprove... like... it was cold back then is Jesus walked REALLY on ICE... HA... Science is stupid..."
If one is going to make an argument either for or against something, it really helps if:
Go back to elementary school for a little while and see if you can't make up for some of that inept homeschooling you've received.
I agree with you. The thought of Jesus walking on ice in the Middle East is absurd. A far more rational assertion is that the story of Jesus walking on water was stolen from the myth of Dionysius, which is considerably older than the gospels.
No need to thank me for helping you out WWJD. Its all in the cause of furthering human knowledge.
This is a scientific argument, as in: How do you walk on water?, has to be a miracle!
Could be ice, could be shallow water, could be bullshit, could certainly be bullshit.
"science is in alot of ways proving the bible correct"
You people really gotta start giving REAL examples of this.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
