You’re just not getting this concept. The earth was formed less than 6,000 years ago and everything on it is younger than that. If it dates older, there’s something wrong with your method, your sample, or your technique.
23 comments
Never considered the possibility that it might be your belief, and not the mountains (literal and figurative) of evidence, that is wrong, eh?
No, YOU'RE not getting the concept. Science works by taking observations and forming a theory from them, not taking a predetermined conclusion and slectively picking and choosing evidence that supports it, ignoring all contradictive evidence.
YOUR method, your sample, or your technique:
The made up numbers (unBiblical, adding to Scripture)of a Catholic Bishop over a hundred years ago. Totally dismissed as invalid by the Catholic church years ago, before they even apologized to long dead Galileo.
As opposed to the cumulative consensus of thousands over more than 1000 years of study and EVIDENCE.
If it dates older, there’s something wrong with your method, your sample, or your technique.
Yes, there's something very wrong with the sample--it's far, far older than you think it is.
"If it dates older, there’s something wrong with your method, your sample, or your technique."
And they say atheists are closed-minded?
"Don't bother me with facts, my mind is made up!"
“You’re just not getting this concept.”
“The earth was formed less than 6,000 years ago and everything on it is younger than that.”
“If it dates older, there’s something wrong with your method,”
“your sample,”
“or your technique.”
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
