You fail on almost every account.
First of all, your user name is inaccurate, as you're using acrostics, not simple acronyms.
Each of your acrostics have major flaws:
1) "E.V.O.L.U.T.I.O.N." is a recursive acrostic, beginning with the world "Evolution." Recursive acronyms are sometimes accepted, but a recursive acrostic is universally considered bad form, for reasons already described (it could be "expanded" repeatedly).
2) While you show some competence by dividing your "I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.T. D.E.S.I.G.N." into two sentences, with the sentence break denoting the world break in the acrostic, you blow it all by representing an initialism (DNA) as a single letter in the acrostic, a practice universally condemned.
3) Similarly, in "D.A.R.W.I.N." you represent the initialism "ID" with the single letter "I." This is wrong.
You also repeatedly use contractions and possesives - I'm, DNA's, Dawkins', Atheism's - in your expanded text; this is considered sloppy (especially when you have two contractions/possesives in a row, as you do in your final acrostic). Additionally, you misplaced the apostrophe in "Dawkin's."
Furthermore, your sentence structure is poor. An acceptable acrostic's expanded text will read like a natural sentence or phrase; "DNA's Encoding Shows Intelligence (God) Needed!" reads like a newspaper headline. The use of a parenthetical aside in the expanded text is ridiculously poor - I can't even say that it's universally condemned, as most people never even thought they had to condemn it. It's that bad.
Finally, there's the fact that your premises are wrong to begin with. DNA's encoding does not indicated that a god is needed; in fact, if humans were intelligently designed, we probably wouldn't have so much "junk" DNA!
In short, I sincerely hope that you learn to formulate coherent thoughts in plain English, first, before graduating to acrostics.
-Summer Glau
P.S.: Be sure to catch the second season of Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles on DVD and Blu-ray September 22, 2009!
