Man Called True
#152369
"Couer, let me ask you this: do you also believe autism is the result of vaccinations? If you do, please submit to having your head blown off with a shotgun. It'll be easier for all of us."
I haven't seen any real evidence either way.
When it comes to vaccination, there's always a slight risk of complicating side-effects.Whether or not mercury derivatives in vaccines actually caused autism is still a matter of debate.A good example, back in the '70s
swine flu vaccine was used against legionnaire's disease.Millions were vaccinated, some 600 people died or suffered adverse reactions because of it.Legionnaire's bacteria was later shown to be normally present in roughly
35-40% of the U.S. population.This was a case of the CDC way overreacting to a freak circumstance.
"As you said, "mainstream" (i.e. truthful) information on AIDS is everywhere around the Internet, so I need not point you to anything in particular.
"Mainstream" Science asserted for decades from the 50's to the 70's that cancer was overwhelmingly caused by a viral agent and the war on cancer was devoted precisely to ferreting out such viruses, to no avail."Mainstream"
science textbooks still hold that beri-beri and other such debilitating
nervous system illnesses are caused by transmissionable microbes,when proper nutrition in the form of B12 vitamins and the like will cure them."Mainstream" science held as utter truth for two decades that "SMON"
a debilitating, polio-like illness which struck middle-age Japanese women with regularity from 1959 to 1973
was a new and emerging virus.
The truth was far more hideous, the women's doctors had been proscribing them excessive amounts of clioquinol,
also known as Enterovioform in brand form for stomach upsets.
When it was all over, more than 11,000 people were affected and thousands of them died.
Here's a link:
http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/data/besmon.htm
Just understand that if you or someone you love dies from it... well, callous as it is I still have the right to laugh."
Nice, so because I happen to agree that the HIV=AIDS hypotheosis is bunk and needs to be debated in open and public forum, I and others who may listen to me, deserve an AIDS defining death.Ya know, the same was wished upon Christine Maggiore,her husband and kids for years, until it bacame obvious all four were doing just fine.
Then some of those folks started saying Maggiore wasn't really HIV positive, that she was actually misdiagnosed and was maliciously leading millions to their deaths.When her daughter died last year,they did an about face. Maggiore was decried as a woman who abused her kid by infecting her with HIV and killing an innocent victim.Nevermind that her husband and son are both HIV- and quite healthy; her daughter was obviously HIV+ and had rapidly progressed into terminal AIDS.
Some problems with the fiasco surrounding her diagnosis, her daughter's HIV serology test has never been revealed,her lungs were clear of fluid and her white blood cell count was massively elevated at the time of her death, in direct odds with the autopsy report.The fact that she also took prescribed amoxillin shortly before her death
has never been seriously considered, even though several other pathologists and MD's, one an AIDS dissident, and several others making up a panel of disinterested and _unpaid_ evaluators all agree Maggiore's daughter's death was consistent with anaphylatic shock brought on by amoxillin toxity.
Here's a site that touts the official view:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christine_Maggiore
and here's another that has an abundance of information including rebuttals and counterbuttals.
http://justiceforej.com/
Not that I fear such for me since I've never been diagnosed HIV+
or for those folks who were HIV+ and introduced me to the literature.Even if I were to be given an "AIDS" test without my knowledge(I'll never consent to one willingly) I sure as hell am not going to let my life get decided by such.
links on the reliability of the AIDS
tests.
http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/index/hivtests.htm
http://www.aras.ab.ca/test.html
http://www.ringnebula.com/project-censored/1995/1995-story16.htm
For god's sake man, all these test carry warning labels from the FDA that state they are not to be used for diagnosis of HIV!
All of the proteins and antibodies tested are cross-reactive, that is,not a single one of them is unique to HIV.
No other infectious agent that I know of is diagnosed in that manner, all have unique proteins and antibodies that code specifically for them as well as cross-reactive proteins and antibodies.The other microbes are tested by their specific proteins and antibodies only.HIV for some bizarre reason, has never had a specific protein/antibody isolated for it to be tested with.Instead, diagnosis is made with both the test and your medical and sexual history.
I don't claim that HIV=AIDS can't exist, I _do_ claim that the current hypotheosis is bunk.
http://aidsmyth.addr.com/report/news/motheringmiscarraigenevillehod.htm
look, I've been devouring the lit on the mainstream view since I was 11 and there have always been so many things that never added up, the predictions of global pandemics,the seeming self-selections within certain populations like gay men,IV drug users, and now poor black women, the revelation that a study was done on HIV tests in healthy dogs with half the dogs testing positive, a yanked Vancouver study where HIV transmission rates were compared between IV drug users that used only clean needles and those who used dirty needles, with the former still having a seroconversion rate 20 times that of a typical heterosexual.AIDS cases without HIV written off as ICD4 because it was unexplainable, and embarassing.
The Concorde study which showed that AZT didn't do a lick for AIDS and in fact killed off patients sooner than placebos.That study was also one of the very few not supported by pharmacological companies or the National Intitute of Health.
Africa is just bizarre, with people saying men are raping little babies as an AIDS cure and that whole villages are being wiped out.The west seems to take all the statistics and numbers as gospel canon, not realizing that they're fables and the situation on the ground in africa is very different from what is reported in mainstream media.For example, about 45 million people are "guesstimated" to be infected with HIV in subsaharan africa, with no real clear numbers on how many die of AIDS every year.About $6 billion dollars went to africa for AIDS in 2000, know how much went for all other infectious diseases combined?$57,000...yes, that's right,
_$57,000_ against malaria, which kills a variously estimated 2 to 3 million a year, against tuberculosis which is fast accelerating.Against a wide variety of other diseases.
Check out Eileen Stillwaggon
http://www.health-e.org.za/news/article.php?uid=20031447
And she totes the Mainstream View!What does that tell you?She's not alone, there's a _lot_ of scientists and other people who support the mainstream view and still believe that the AIDS Establishment is grossly corrupt and incompetent, just check out that movie The Constant Gardener.
I would be far less upset and vocal if genuine debates and a common sense realization that a whole different attitude and outlook is needed.I don't believe in knocking the AIDS drugs out of someone's mouth, that's their choice.I _do_ believe that _all_ relevant information should be made available, and moreso, those HIV+ people who are long-term nonprogressors, whether they're on the drugs or not, should be studied and _all_ aspects of their medical,sexual,dietary,environmental and recreational drug use histories recorded.
A study like that would only cost between $100 million to a billion dollars total over say 20 to 30 years.Sounds like a lot?We've spent a combined 100 billion on the HIV=AIDS hypotheosis over the last 23 years.Such proposals have been made to the NIH many times and rejected.What would the AIDS Establishment have to lose?According to them, the results of the study should prove them out.If not, then maybe it means we take a different tact.
two years ago I met a HIV+ who was a long term non-progressor and does not take the HIV/AIDS drugs.They showed me the literature after I questioned them.
I've met several more, and I'm still waiting for them to sicken and die.I think I'll be waiting for the next 50 to 70 years.