"Evolution is just a religion with more proof"
...and yours hasn't. Your point?
But then, if a 'religion' has proof, then it's not a religion; 'Proof denies Faith' and all that jazz. And that's the least of your problems. Why? Your very own Scripture - the 'Word of God', no less - states in 1 Thessalonians 5:21 (KJV): 'Prove all things', so even the very basis of your religion destroys itself.
...but then, if - to avoid the above multi-dimensional paradox worthy of an MC Escher artwork - you admit that Evolution isn't a 'religion', where does that leave your argument? Never mind what so many like you say, re. Atheism, and your (non)-'religion's status with the IRS...?
Oh, and 'If.' [/Spartan Laconic Wit] [/Teach The Controversy]
image
That is why you FAIL. [/Yoda]
@apYrs
"bring on the FSM."
...and J.R. 'Bob' Dobbs, Cthulhu, the Invisible Pink Unicorn/Lauren Faustism (also Eris [/Jaquelindreamz]), Haruhi Suzumiya, you name it. ALL religions, o fundies, and therefore worthy of inclusion in the school curriculum. You fundies say it, we Atheists don't: 'all theories about mankind's appearance on Earth'. So that even means teaching the ancient Mayan 'Popol Vuh', the Aboriginal 'Dreamtime', Shinto writings about Amaterasu etc; all just as credible - believable - as your Biblical 'Cre(a)ti(o)nist' fairytales...?!
Teach the Controversy indeed.
