if you are a gay who wont settle with civil unions that will give you some of the rights of married people or make homosexual acts and claim to be a Cristian ,if you wont straighten up then why dont you just "get aids and die"
37 comments
if you are a gay who wont settle with civil unions that will give you some of the rights of married people
Yes, why would they settle on getting just some of the rights.
But I assume that most if not all homosexuals will be satisfied, if they could have civil unions that give them all of the rights of a married couple, leaving the religious ceremony of the marriage as that what it is, just a ceremony that has no special meaning outside of your system of belief (and for which the religious could have set own rules, banning whoever they want from it)
If you are a fundie who won't settle for seperation of church and state, which will give you all the same rights as everyone else but no special privileges, or treat everyone like dirt and claim to 'love them', if you won't grow a brain, why don't you just "drink the kool-aid and die"?
Gays pay taxes too? Of course. So why should there be any legal discrimination against them?
Religion is a separate issue. For a Church or religion to interfere in the granting of equal rights to all citizens is a political act and should automatically disqualify such a religion/church from tax exemption and re-define it as a political organization.
Note: you said "some" of the rights. Not all. Why shouldn't gay couples get all of the rights? That's what they want. That's one of the main reasons why they're not content with simply being in civil unions and want to get married. And if civil unions are good enough for them, then why aren't more heterosexuals joining civil unions?
Separate but equal does not work, moron. And you are a heartless cretin for telling them to die simply because they are gay. Homosexuality is not a choice. Bigoted stupidity is. So why don't YOU "straighten up?"
I'm really thinking we should consider this "civil union" thing. Basically leave "marriages" to the churches, and "civil unions" are done by JPs. I'm thinking we'd probably get a few more votes that way.
Although, I'm sure the fundies would rally the troops against that too.
Ah yes, the "Take our stale cookie and stop trying to make us share our cake, dammit!" argument.
And by the way, what does this "claim to be a Cristian" crap have to do with CIVIL marriage, the kind that involves the rights given to married couples by the government?
"Why not let them have all the rights we heteros have? And I'm getting something oooooo weeeeeee ooooooo Not love. Nope not love"
Because:
1. Many of the "rights" that come from marriage are positive rights, rather than negative rights
2. Marriage is an institution for raising children primarily. Expanding marriage to include gays normalizes the idea that children can be motherless or fatherless, not as an accident of circumstance but as something that we can aspire to or simply ignore.
3. A legal distinction between marriages and civil unions is no more different than the legal distinction between corporations (for profit entities) and charitable NGOs. Are you going to argue this is discrimination as well?
Gays now have the right to marry in the US; your side lost.
Would YOU settle with civil unions, and just have SOME of the rights that others take for granted?
What is "homosexual acts"? A woman kissing another woman? Two women adopting a child?
Can you "gay up"? If not, why should they "straighten up"?
Most people getting AIDS today are heterosexuals in sub-Saharan Africa.
Most people having HIV in western countries don't die of it, as it's now manageable.
Why won't the Christain bigots' 'cause' die in the UK?
Because after the appeal in Northern Ireland failed, it has .
Christain bigotry got Ebola and has died screaming in infinite agony. Good.
@Swede
"Most people having HIV in western countries don't die of it, as it's now manageable."
It should be noted that HIV medication is insanely expensive and... well... it's gonna lead to a very agonizing death if it progresses to AIDS when you get older as your body fails to fight even a simple infection.
You acting like it's no big deal seriously trivializes the issue of HIV. Stop.
#1987554
Charlie Sheen.
"You acting like it's no big deal seriously trivializes the issue of HIV. Stop."
What are you going to do if we don't? S-SM is completely legal in USA, hetero people are HIV+.
And you're still typing away impotently on a site, where you somehow think it'll make a difference. Your "words" changing the world to how you personally wanting it to be.
Just ask yourself a question: are they having any effect?
"Stop trivializing" things? Make us. Because you're doing a perfectly good job in preventing those things being trivialized. How's things with your "Reality Redefinition" project since you first appeared here?
@1987620
"What are you going to do if we don't"
""Stop trivializing" things? Make us."
Okay so you just admitted that you do trivialize the issue of HIV.
What am I going to do about it? I already did. I got you to admit that you guys are clowns. :)
Keep these pearls of wisdom like "HIV is no big deal" coming.
What's next? "Cancer is no big deal"? LOL!!!
@#1987627
"Cancer"
Thank you for admitting you are. Honesty. So refreshing in a narrowminded hypocritical rightist. For that is all you've been since you first infected FSTDT. And your mindset always will be Cancer. Which will soon be cured by the Chemo that is Reality. Rightism. It's like AIDS for the brain.
In your own words: LOL!!!
Why complain about antiretroviral drugs and their cost? You say that such things shouldn't be trivialised, we didn't.
So many straight people need to take them too. Should we trivialise their situation: certainly whether or not they can afford them...?
@#1987674
"You'd be more welcome in Where Liberty Dwells. Or some other right wing blog where you won't be pwned with every post you make."
We've had a fair few quotes from one denizen of 'Whore Lie-Party Smells': one Duckturd Dumb . Perhaps that site's most vociferously racist & homophobic member. Yet, he outed himself as gay.
That site didn't last long after that. Irony. What a Nasty Woman thou art! [/Ignatius J. Reilly]
Perhaps that's why failtroll is here: the number of echo-chambers is decreasing, so he has to come here. That, or he's been banned from so many other alt-shite hugboxes/other forums etc, this is his only possible outlet for his mental handicap-based behaviour.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.