The Bible doesn't speak much of the sin of Homosexuality?
It also doesn't speak of incest or bestiality much more neither?
Guess you want to make them legal and not a sin also!
22 comments
Quite the opposite. I think they ought to as harshly and relentlessly prosecuted as those people who eat shellfish, wear mixed cloth or use beard-trimmers. *UGH!* (Leviticus:19-20)
But only by people completely free from any wrongdoing themselves, obviously. (John:8)
David B. "But only by people completely free from any wrongdoing themselves, obviously. (John:8)"
I believe that would fall under "cruelty to children", David. Besides, if justice is slow already, I cannot imagine the queues once we start using new borns for lawyers.
Hope that helps,
Grey Wolf
Bestiality is legal in many states. And as long as you don't hurt the animal...
And I have no problem with non-forced incest. Hell, I wish I'd had a cute sister to play with...
God didn't seem to have a problem when Lot's daughters forced themselves on their passed-out-drunk father in an effort to get pregnant.
Of course, he didn't have a problem with Lot offering said daughters up to a rape-gang, either.
-pb
Guess you want to make them legal and not a sin also!
Our laws aren't based on what the Bible calls "sin". The Bible doesn't speak of insider trading, dumping your used motor oil down storm sewers or selling post-dated milk. On the other hand, it forbids eating shrimp, touching a dead body or wearing clothing made of both wool and linen.
This is the 21st century, for chrissake. The only biblical rule incorporated in our laws is a simple one: "Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets." Matthew 7:12.
According to Genesis, humanity is a product of incest. There is also a Jewish myth, that the reason god made Eve, was to stop Adam shagging all the animals.
Joke's on you, sucker. According to the bible, without the incest of Lot and his daughters, we wouldn't have Jesus.
The Bible has a lot of incest, and I'm going to assume you either ignore it, blocked it out, or haven't actually read much of the Bible. Although granted, in Leviticus parent-child and sibling incest is explicitly banned, the Bible does seem to make it okay for cousins to marry and have children.
So maybe you should actually, ya know, read your Bible?
Oh, look at that. I do believe this anonymous character is the first person to draw parallels between homosexuality and incest or bestiality.
What two consenting adults do in their bedroom is their business, as long as it doesn't involve a nonconsenting party, like children or animals. You know, consent ? The thing that distinguishes sex from a sex crime? No wonder you can't tell the fucking difference; it must all look like a crime to you.
A Friend wrote:
"The babble also doesn't tell you how to build a starship or how to play football. Your point is."
Silly boy! You don't NEED to know how to build a starship because, according to the bible, the stars are nothing more than little points of light hanging from the Vault of Heaven, some hundred miles or so over our heads.
Actually, there is a bit for incest in the bible, both the practicing of it by important figures, and against it. Yet the ones who did it (like Lot's daughters) never get condemned for it. As long as they're both consenting adults, I really can't see what's wrong (other than inbreeding).
Bible talks against bestiality too, more so than it does against homosexual males (it's very quite on lesbians from what I recall).
Of course, homosexuality, incest, and bestiality are only talked about in the section that your savior freed you from, so what's the problem?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.