So I am the ignorant one, but you believe that homosexuality is not against nature. Any 5th grader knows that a penis does not fit into a penis and a vagina the like. But you think thats natural. Even if you approach this from an evolutionary perspective you still lose. Homosexuality does not propagate a species, therefore it would be a rejection of the evolutionary process. But it is my opinion that gays can do want they want in private, it is their free choice. I am just against gay marriage.
52 comments
That's right, we're only designed for penis in vagina sex, and nothing else. That's why the clit is on the outside, and the prostate is on the inside!
"Homosexuality does not propagate a species, therefore it would be a rejection of the evolutionary process"
You know, unless whatever factors cause homosexuality do other things as well, things beneficial enough to the species at large that they outweigh the "cost" of an occasional gay child...
While we're throwing around inane irrelevancies:
-A vagina does not fit into a penis.
-A penis fits into a hand, an anus, and a mouth.
-A LOT of dicks fit into a clerical collar.
Your permission to do what they're going to do anyway is so cute.
" Any 5th grader knows that a penis does not fit into a penis and a vagina the like."
I thought you people were against sex ed? Also: that is nice that you are fine with people doing what they want in private, but why exactly would marriage be any different? What business is their marriage to you?
"a penis does not fit into a penis and a vagina the like"
No, but they do fit into other places, and other things fit into them, and from what I've heard, sometimes it-
Well, you get the point. You can look it up on the Wikipedia if you need to.
"Homosexuality does not propagate a species, therefore it would be a rejection of the evolutionary process"
There is no way to reject evolution. For one thing, homosexuality is likely a product of evolution in one way or another, and also, since it doesn't actually propagate the species, that just means eventually, as a trait, it will die out and evolution will say, "Hmm. Let's try something different."
There is a type of lizard in the the southwest U.S.A. that has no males. However, they do procreate. In order to do so, one lizard must act like the male and sexually stimulate the other lizard in order to cause the body to produce eggs.
So I am the ignorant one, but you believe that homosexuality is not against nature.
It isn't. Many animals in nature are homosexual.
Homosexuality does not propagate a species, therefore it would be a rejection of the evolutionary process.
Homosexuals can reproduce.
I am just against gay marriage.
Why? How is it any of your concern if gays get married?
No, but a penis fits in the mouth, hand, butt, between the toes, and wherever else you want to get creative. Don't get me started on what can go into a vagina.
I'm sure that gay marriage would be private, so I don't see what the hell your problem is with that.
"Even if you approach this from an evolutionary perspective you still lose."
I thought the theory behind this was that since we are social animals (living in large groups) having particular members that, while being otherwise healthy, will never reproduce leads to an increase in the adults to children ratio and creates a safer environment for the young.
Thinking Allowed, they're a species of whiptail lizard. They're whored out quite frequently as examples over here. Mostly because, come on, lesbian lizards? You couldn't make that shit up.
Any 5th grader knows that a penis does not fit into a penis and a vagina the like.
Obviously, sir, you have never heard of tribadism or double ended dildos. And the loss is entirely yours, believe me.
Penis fits in butt (and other places)!
Vags grind nicely against each other, with or without the help of a double dildo!
Wow. Someone clearly hasn't done hir homework.
"Actually, from an evolutionary perspective homosexuality could be viewed as a kind of built-in population control mechanism. We don't exactly have a shortage of people."
CITATION NEEDED. Or a proper understanding of evolution needed. Either would be fine.
"So I am the ignorant one, but you believe that homosexuality is not against nature."
Well it is idiotic to believe something that actually happens in nature, amongst 1500 species , could be natural.
"Any 5th grader knows that a penis does not fit into a penis and a vagina the like."
Wait, gays were trying to fit their penises inside each other?
"Even if you approach this from an evolutionary perspective you still lose. Homosexuality does not propagate a species, therefore it would be a rejection of the evolutionary process."
Population control, anyone?
A hand does not fit into a hand, but we manage to shake hands anyway.
A penis fits perfectly into a mouth or the anal orifice, vagina's can be rubbed together, kind of like mouths when kissing.
A breast does not fit into a penis either, but the breast can be used to massage, caress, stroke the penis. Or is that too exotic, only the missionary for you?
Homosexuality keeps population growth in check. And it's present in other animals as well, ergo it is natural.
Isn't a marriage a rather private affair? It's a contract between you and your partner; to stick together and to take care of each other, for as long as you both love each other.
So don't attend the wedding.
Also, you should learn more about evolution before you try to argue against it.
People here seem to be making the mistake of assuming that when fundies talk about "nature" they're referring to anything we might refer to as, well, nature . For fundies, "nature" has a different meaning: doctrine. Something is "natural" if it fits into the fundie's personal conception of "how things should be", and unnatural if it varies from what that doctrinal position says it should be like. So it's completely possible, in fundie-speak, for nature to be unnatural.
"But it is my opinion that gays can do want they want in private, it is their free choice. I am just against gay marriage."
Yes, the ways of this world depend so much on your opinion.
"Any 5th grader-"
NO! Just...No.
So I am the ignorant one, but you believe that homosexuality is not against nature.
Indeed, how can something implicitly found in nature possibly be natural, right?
Any 5th grader knows that a penis does not fit into a penis and a vagina the like.
No, but that doesn't mean you can't get creative. And if it's so bad, how come the prostate is so easily accessed and stimulated via the anus?
But you think thats natural. Even if you approach this from an evolutionary perspective you still lose. Homosexuality does not propagate a species, therefore it would be a rejection of the evolutionary process.
Really? Having a stable pairing of mates unable to propogate, however capable of caring for young just the same is an evolutionary inferiority?
But it is my opinion that gays can do want they want in private, it is their free choice. I am just against gay marriage.
So we're allowed to do what we will in private and away from you, so long as it doesn't involve a private ceremony binding us together legally that affects you not at all. Seems you have your ear to the floorboards more than you care to admit.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.