Scientists have tried to prove for hundreds of years that evolution is true. The only way evolution could be true is if there were no missing links, right? Well, they have recently spotted teradactyls in Papua New Guinea which means that teradactyls have never evolved and according to evolution everything evolves sooner or later. Because teradactyls have never evolved into other creatures, that makes evolution false. And you say God isn't real....go ahead and explain why He isn't because I think even those scientists are proving you wrong now!
Even your own religion (science) is turning on you atheists. Creationism is the truth and you guys know it, you just don't want to admit that you''re wrong. Well, you may as well admit it, because being "right" is not worth an eternity in hell, is it? Use your fucking brain for once!
64 comments
Scientists have tried to prove for hundreds of years that evolution is true.
Wrong.
The only way evolution could be true is if there were no missing links, right?
Wrong.
Well, they have recently spotted teradactyls in Papua New Guinea
Wrong.
which means that teradactyls have never evolved
False premise, false conclusion: Wrong.
according to evolution everything evolves sooner or later.
Sort of, but in the context you are using it: Wrong.
Because teradactyls have never evolved into other creatures, that makes evolution false.
Wrong.
And that was just the "sensible" part of their post...
Wait wait wait.......people have seen pteradactyls, creatures that have believed to be extinct for millions of years and this some how proves the fact that they never evolved. First of all evolution dosn't say anything on a particular species. It covers all of biology in general and even though paleontology has said that pteradactlys have been extinct for eons and suddenly a living colony has been found dosn't mean evolution is wrong. It means paleontology was wrong about pterdactlys. Does it disprove all paleontological facts up to this point? Possibly regarding pteradactlys but nothing else. Does it prove evolution wrong? Of course not! Becayse evolution is not like religious doctrine and has the flexability to withstand new discoveries that disprove facts that are only slightly related to it.
One more thing, you're obviously lying. Unlike the ceolocanth which has been living in the deep ocean for the past 60 million years, thus making it impossible to get a fossil of, pteradactlys lived all over the Earth and fossils of them are constantly being unearthed. However none of them are older then 65 million years old. Not a single one has been found past that point. This shows they all died out and shows you're a fucking moron.
Shit why not say you found them over Cleveland? Are you truly this stupid all the time or have you saved it all up for us? Even Art Bell, where this crazy story broke, didn't buy this idiotic story about teradactyls(sic) in New Guinea. I would suggest you "use your fucking brain for once", but I doubt that even the most sensitive scientific instruments could find one inside your head?
Creationism is the truth and you guys know it, you just don't want to admit that you''re wrong. Well, you may as well admit it, because being "right" is not worth an eternity in hell, is it?
Yes. You are absolutely right. Creationism is the truth and the only reason I wont shift my position now is because I've got too much invested in it now. I couldn't handle the loss of face from saying that someone like Bro Randy is right.
You'd think that the eternity of torture in the fires of hell would convince me too wouldn't you? But it's so much easier than that! All I had to do was ]b]Use your fucking brain for once! Problem solved! If only we could apply that kind of clear thinking to every problem.
Even if pterodactyls were still around, how would that affect the theory of evolution? Evolution doesn't require pterodactyls to be extinct. Coelacanths were thought to have gone extinct at the same time as the dinosaurs, and they found one alive in 1938. Scorpions have been around in one form or another since the Silurian (over 420 million years ago). This has nothing to do with overturning evolution.
Evolution has nothing to do with a belief in God. It conflicts with a literal interpretation of Genesis, but then again, so does physics, geology and biology. Lots of people believe in God without believing in talking snakes and trees with magic fruit on them.
You'd think they'd have come up with some new lies by now, or least vary the old ones a little. Pterodactyls in New Guinea? Did you believe the one about the Tooth Fairy, too? Oh, wait, I forgot...
"they have recently spotted teradactyls in Papua New Guinea"
GRFC2, This is an emergency. Drop and roll. Drop and roll. Your pants are on fire.
"according to evolution everything evolves sooner or later"
Not so. As long as the environmental niche necessary for the survival of a well-adapted species continues to exist, that species may continue to exist with essential no evolutionary changes.
"Use your fucking brain for once!"
Or, you could use your brain... for something other than a boat anchor.
I thought the pterodactyls were living in the center of the Earth? You'd better check with B®ent and Edgar Rice Burroughs on that one.
Either way, you're full of shit. Never mind the coelacanth, have you ever heard of sharks? They've been around unchanged for quite a while too.
For what it's worth, there will never be enough transitionary fossils to please fundies. Theirs is a God of the Gaps, so there must always be gaps.
But they're getting smaller.
Bee:
'This has to be one of the itty-bitty creationist kiddies who post on the Cryptozoology.com forum'.
Ah, you mean DinoPhil, the home-educated kid with the vanity-published book. I've thought of putting his demented ramblings on here before, but as he's just a kid (albeit a deluded one) I thought it'd be a bit unfair.
Incidentally, the pterosaurs are called 'ropen': here's the main site, made by someone old and educated enough to know better:
http://www.laattorneyvideo.com/nonlegal/pterosaurs/what/
They have found remains of pterodactil, bones, you know, not spot them flying, it´s maybe because it existed. Period. It doesn´t mean that it didn´t evolve, only that they found the remainders of one of them, who died some time million of years ago. They found too the rests of Lucy, an Austhralopitecus, so, following your logic, we shouldn´t exist. Any missing link in your head?
No.
Missing links PROVE evolution, and a large number of those have been found.
And I'd like to see your evidence that pterodactyls have been seen, please. If it was a newspaper I'll bet it was right next to an article about Elvis being seen or a woman being molested by aliens on her way home from shopping.
The "evidence" of the pterosaurs in New Guinea are the sort of thing you see regarding Bigfoot and Nessie.
It's a local monster story, and has no scientific standing.
Also, it is evident that you know nothing regarding evolution or - apparently - spelling & punctuation.
Just googled it, Darwin's Origin of Species was first published 24th November 1859. That makes it a bit under 1.5 "hundreds of years" old.
Crocodiles are also virtually unchanged from the form that they occupied eons ago. Nature is clearly following the engineers maxim: "If it works don't f*** about with it."
Who knows, there may be pterodactyls living in PNG, or it might have been an unusually large fruit bat going by most of the reports I've found. There may be an evolutionary niche for flying reptiles, it's largely jungle with all manner of wierd shit running round...
"according to evolution everything evolves sooner or later. Because teradactyls have never evolved into other creatures, that makes evolution false." COULDN"T BE MORE WRONG IF YOU TRIED.
"And you say God isn't real....go ahead and explain why He isn't", The first step is to prove that he is real.
" Even your own religion (science) is turning on you atheists." Now, now now, you're making that up. But I shouldn't be surprised...
"Use your fucking brain for once!" HA HA HA, you fucking twit. Right back at you!!!
kara wrote: "hey i think that dinosaurs are extint because they were too stupid to stay alive"
If that were true, you'd qualify as a weapon of mass destruction, kara.
PHAIL!
image
"everything evolves sooner or later. Because teradactyls have never evolved into other creatures"
(Before I rip this apart, what is a teradactyl? is it like a pterodactyl?)
If we accept that his shit-stupid premise is true, he is still wrong because we ARE NOT AT THE END OF TIME YOU FUCKING RETARD.
So this person claims that:
1. The theory of evolution is hundreds of years old.
2. The theory of evolution CANNOT be true if we find a SINGLE missing link in the fossil record.
3. 'Pterodactyl' is actually spelled 'teradactyl'.
4. Pterodactyls (or should I say, 'teradactyls') exist, alive, in the modern world.
5. The theory of evolution claims that everything has to evolve eventually.
6. Science is a religion.
7. Atheists know creationism is correct, but are just in denial.
8. Atheists care about the christian threat that they're going to Hell.
And THEN asks that atheists use their brains! Wow. Hypocrisy at its best.
Creationism is the truth and you guys know it, you just don't want to admit that you''re wrong.
Oh, just fuck off and die, you arrogant moron. Clearly the idea of someone sincerely and rationally disagreeing with your good self is beyond your comprehension.
Your story is bullshit. Even so, what eould it prove? There are mosquitoes, cockroaches, dragonflies, and ferns living today, and fossils of those organisms older than the diinosaurs. All that shows is that these are successful forms of life, nothing more. We know that, as mosquitoes live in all climate areas, as long as there's water to breed in and a food source, such as humans, nearby.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.