@tfaddict
@[I]Liar4Life
"I hope we can break bread and be kind to each other even if we disagree on some crucial issues"
Just to let you know, she's done this before in the past: all 'Nicer than Spice' & 'Lovey-Dovey'. But do not be deceived. Please note what she said beforehand:
"I do hope you'll find peace and get to know your Creator one day"
Still the thinly veiled forcing her Paulian beliefs on us, otherwise, why so much as think of saying that in the first place, if as she claims that she wants to 'make peace' with us?
She would, if she was 'Sincere'.
But she's not. Proof: If [/Spartan Laconic Wit] she was 'Sincere', then she would do one of three things:
1- Realise - via her mental handicap-based trolling, coupled with Reality not bending to her will despite all the 'attempts' at her forcing her Paulian ways on us - that she's wrong in every conceivable way, do a Jonathan Edwards, recant of her unjustifiable 'beliefs' & become an Atheist.
2- Drop the whole 'Turn or Burn' BS, openly state that we Atheists & LGBT people won't be going to this fictional 'Hell' she bangs on & on about, and will be saved regardless (just like all Jews - who are 'Disobedient' because they are Jews, will be going to heaven via Romans 11:26-32 - thus because Atheism & Homosexuality are Disobedience too, therefore we are Saved & going to Heaven, via Rom. 30-32. Also because I an Saved too, via my giving my blood-pump to Jayzarse (http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=102749&Page=4#1700396) then doing a Jonathan Edwards; because of OSAS, then I AM Saved, and fundies such as Derpy4Life, via Matthew 7:1 don't have the right to think of questioning my Saved status, ergo I AM Saved & going to Heaven & 'know'* my Creator**, thus making her previous attempts at 'conversion' utterly pointless, thus making the whole point of her infecting FSTDT worse-than pointless, thus...:
3- Do another 'Disappearing Act'. Only this time, make it permanent.
Lardy4Life would do one of these things. If she was as 'Sincere' as she makes out to be in her most recent post.
...but then, as proved by her long track record of lying, thus breaking the 9th Commandment, she puts the In the 'Sin' in cerity, certainly.
But she can always prove us wrong. Those three options.
As I say, tfaddict my friend, do not allow her honeyed words to get through your shielding; for - as with her Paulian 'God', as proved above - she is a deceiver. For she is mentally handicapped & thus retarded - via her Multiple Personality Disorder-based trolling techniques, coupled with convenient & selective 'Amnesia' - to in one instance (as shown above) attempt to 'get on your good side', yet later, all but schlick herself into oblivion as she gleefully wanted to watch the likes of you burn in the Lake O'Fire for eternity. Not the mindset of a psychologically secure, and therefore superior person, I'm sure you'd agree. For someone secure in their faith, would never be mentally handicapped - and therefore inferior - enough to want to force their beliefs on those who (and for several years now) never wanted her form of 'Faith' in the first place. Thus Matthew 10:14. The definition of Insanity is doing the same thing over & over again, yet expecting different results. I await her presentation of just one FSTDTer who has converted to her way of thinking in all the years of her infecting this place. If she can, to justify her continued existence here in FSTDT.
If it pleases the court, I would like to submit Exhibit 1; well, the only one, certainly required to prove her worse-than lies, and thus her trolling, like the inferior subhuman she is:
http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=105570&Page=3#1750881
The prosecution rests.
I trust that, taking into account the previous words by Augustine of Hippo, Retard4Life will do one of the above. If she's as 'Sincere' as she claims to be, and not the troll sje actually is.
PROTIP: I have shown many of her posts here in FSTDT to my best friend, who is a long-time Church of England Christian. His conclusion: 'If only she, and everyone like her who aren't Christians, but are Paulians, could see the untold damage they are doing to themselves and their agenda, then no wonder so many are falling away from their twisted form of 'Faith' and becoming more moderate Christians at least. It's certainly doing their cause of 'Saving others' no good whatsoever, because their corrupted form of faith is, if anything, putting off people from joining them. As the fact that the West is becoming more and more secularised demonstrates.'
There are commenters in FSTDT who are ex-Fundies. They got tired of the Paulian bullshit, as spewed by you & your ilk. They. The non-fundie Christian Jonathan Edwards. As stated before: What's [I]your[/I] excuse, dearie?
But that's one option available to you, thus you would be justified in commenting on FSTDT: against fundies such as you are right now; but that can change, it's up to you.
If Jonathan Edwards can change, what's your excuse? Like I say, as per he & yours truly (http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=102749&Page=4#1700396): OSAS.
Or you can simply choose the third option. If [/Spartan Laconic Wit] you were as Sincere as you claim you are. Or just as Sinner - like your Paulian 'God', as proved above - much?
We Atheists, LGBT people & non-fundie theists aren't the sinners. No flies on us.
*- 'Know'. As in the Biblical sense. Therfore God approves of homosexuals. She said it, I didn't!
**- My Creators were my mother & Father. The former someone who had a 'Take it or leave it' attitude to religion (weddings, christenings & funerals only), the latter a hardcore Atheist. But at least, when he caught me reading the Bibvle, he didn't so much as interrupt me when I was reading such. Properly. Because he knew that my doing so would have the desired effect:
'Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for Atheism ever conceived'
-Isaac Asimov
Thanks dad & Isaac. That was the best education I'd ever received. And at least the Shakespeare of Sci-Fi & my parents existed:
image
A rainbow doesn't actually physically exist, yet can be seen, then as per the above scene from "Bruce Almighty", if your 'God' can't actually do as per the above, then he's not 'Omnipotent', thus he's not God, therefore he doesn't exist.
Can't actually know someone who can't show themselves, or at least prove their existence. Question: Can this 'Moses' - unlike Akhenaten & Ramses II - be proven to have existed, archaeologically, with empirical secular peer reviewed evidence? Can your 'God'...?
Isaac Asimov wrote books himself. He existed. As does Richard Dawkins. When this 'God' was too much of a lazy cunt to have written those 613 Commandments himself, yet he somehow & oh so conveeeeeniently could for the later ten, but couldn't equally be 'Omnipotent' enough to just poof his Word - the Bible - into being, then no inconsistency on his part, nosiree! [/Doug Piranha-levels of sarcasm]
You know the only possible answer if you can't, dearie. I refer you to those three options above.
If there are ex-fundies who are commenters here in FSTDT, therefore...!