Transitional Fossils vs. Luke
According to Luke, there are no transitional fossils between God and man.
"Luke 3:38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God."
Notice nothing is mentioned between Adam and God?
Should we insert 2.3 million years of Homo [thisnthat] in there?
I trow not.
31 comments
"trow", here, is a gratuitous anachronism intended to make the OP's sophomoric non-argument sound erudite.
it's old(? - possibly early modern) english for "believe", derived from old norse "troth" IIRC.
Should we insert 2.3 million years of Homo [thisnthat] in there?
No, we should insert a footnote saying "all this is, of course, a bunch of mythology invented by some anonymous Bronze Age Arabs.
Welcome back, AV1611VET.
"Transitional Fossils vs. Luke"
Chewbacca (Peter Mayhew): 'WRAAARRGH!'
Han Solo (Harrison Ford): 'You said it, Chewie: Where did you dig up that old fossil ?! '
-"Star Wars IV: A New Hope"
[/Nerd] X3
Ah, AV1611VET. The gift that keeps on derping. And take a look at him on that forum: over 2.75 million posts there. 'A Life'. Ever hear of it, pal?
Notice nothing is mentioned between Adam and God?
Notice how there's a shit-ton of evidence for stuff that would be there IF a god even existed...? Guess the Bible is incredibly incomplete.
Why trust it to be the final word on anything...?
Christians everywhere must be frustrated and saddened to know that AV1611VET is on their side. Whereas, atheists are very glad, extremely amused, and perfectly comfortable, though somewhat relieved, with the fact that AV1611VET is not on their side. 'Tis to laugh!
Also, proof positive that medications can't always diminish the lure of delusions or dispel the comforting aura of gullibility.
Transitional Fossils vs. Luke
Roadrunner vs. Luke.
Roadrunner: "beep, beep".
Should we bother with Luke?
I trow not.
After reading this post, I had to trow-up.
I've also noticed many Christers tend to use archaic language or forms to give the BS they shovel a certain degree of intelligence. However, no matter how much you polish a turd, it remains a turd.
Now, the question that comes to mind is, how are we to take this BS if we do not believe that Adam, Eve, Luke, Seth or god ever existed? Why, we continue to regard it as BS.
"According to Luke..."
Who gives a shit?
Except that no god exists, so there would be no fossil lineage for some sort of homo zombiejebus.
Actually that sounds like a movie I'd watch "homo zombie jesus"
Transitional Fossils vs. Luke
“According to Luke, there are no transitional fossils between God and man.”
“Notice nothing is mentioned between Adam and God?”
“Should we insert 2.3 million years of Homo [thisnthat] in there?”
“I trow not.”
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
