“Atheists is it possible you don't understand the spiritual realm?”
Maybe. Which author are we talking? Butler? King? McGuyre? And which series of which author?
“Let's get real here because there's too much bickering going on on yahoo answers.”
Heh. GET REAL on the SPIRITUAL realm. Good one.
“Theists believe in spiritual unnatural things they don't see, Atheists believe in natural things they can observe. I'm sure we can all agree on this statement.”
Well, no. I don’t ‘believe’ in, for example, gravity, i understand the observations made and accept it as real. I reserve ‘believe’ for things i accept as real but lack objective proof for.
“Now Atheists is it possible you don't understand the spiritual realm, simply because you can't see it.”
No, i would say i don’t ‘understand’ it because it varies from believer to believer. Different faiths and different members of the same faith can’t agree on what the fuck it is.
I can’t see gravity, either, but i can use it to calibrate my guidance systems.
“So if you can't see it or observe it, you will never logically understand it correct?”
Incorrect. Understanding it requires a consistent definition, not visible access.
“The more you argue with Theists makes you look ignorant.”
Sure it does, twat waffle. You’ve been incorrect every single statement you’ve made. And I’m Ignorant?
“That's like saying Alex lives in England, yet you can't see him nor have you met him, but you still argue Alex doesn't exist in England.”
No. Because ‘Alex’ isn’t an impossible claim. I don’t have to ask how youknow about Alex. You say that the Spiritual exists? How do you know? Did you experience it? Or just what other people told you?
“Or Atheists do you like to argue just to convince yourself and your fellow atheists you can't possibly be wrong.”
I can possibly be wrong. I don’t think you’re terribly open to that idea, though.
“Grow the hell up Atheists and stop arguing about things you can't possibly comprehend! [Emphasis added]”
Shut the fuck up, twatwaffle, unless and until you can provide consistent reasoning, objective observations, rational definitions, and the slightest fucking reason to think you know what you’re talking about? Dismissing me as ignorant because i disagree with you is not the way.
