This much is true:
Any organisation that is exclusionary is OK, unless its a whites-only exclusionary society. Then it's against the laws of the land.
Also, there is a large (and growing) pressure on white people to feel ashamed for the bad things our ancestors did, whilst their achievements are constantly underplayed.
This gets a "3" from me. Definite racist overtones, and the BNP membership doesn't help. But there is a kernel of truth in it.
And I will honestly state my beliefs re: Islam.
Having read studies on the Qu'ran, some of the quotes in it disturb me intensely about Muslims' ability to hold on to both their religion and a modern world.
When people say that the Bible also encouraged violence (Yes, Mohammed did this - in spades), genocide (ditto), polygamy (he had at least 4 wives) and child marriage (his fourth was 6 when they engaged, and 9 when they married), the one crucial difference is this: Jesus, the central figure of the Christian faith, never did any of that.
Jesus never preached violence.
Jesus never killed people for refusing to bow to him.
Jesus never took child brides.
And whilst Jesus' followers frequently ignore his example, Mohammed DID do all of those things. And under the strictures of Islam, Muslims must strive to emulate Mohammed in all things, as he was the final prophet before the coming of the Messiah.
Any Muslim who lives in the West and abides by (for instance) secular law is ignoring the commandments of Mohammed. And many do, but they are no longer Muslims, but takfir, apostate. They have abandoned the teachings of Mohammed, and act contrary to his commandments and shariah law.
Quranic verses that most disturb me:
9:5. Then when the Sacred Months have passed, then kill the Mushrikun {note: unbelievers} wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every ambush. But if they repent and perform As-Salat (note: Iqamat-as-Salat is the Islamic ritual prayer), and give Zakat {note: alms}, then leave their way free. Verily, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
- Can a Muslim live in peace alongside a kaffir, whilst following this verse's instructions?
9:29. Fight against those who believe not in Allah, nor in the Last Day, nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (note: This means Islam) among the people of the Scripture (note: dhimmis are the Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
- Can Muslims even accept that non-Muslims can have their own codes of laws? This verse indicates otherwise.
Volume 1, Book 2, Number 24; Narrated Ibn Umar: Allah's Apostle said: "I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform that, then they save their lives and property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (note: judgement) will be done by Allah."
- According to this, all Muslims have a duty to fight until all are Muslims. Or is this not so?
These are just three examples of Qu'ranic verses, all of them authoritative, all of them holding power unbroken by later, contradictary commandments, and all of them commanding subjugation of non-Muslims.
P.S. Mr. Creazil: Actually, Nazi came from the party's name, National Socialist - Nazi. Alternatively, it came from the party's acronym: NSDAP (National Socialist German Workers' Party).
@Ian C: Fine, they don't allow kaffirs in instead. Besides being much more accurate, I hope that the point is got across more effectively now. Such groups DO exist, with official blessing, and DO exclude non-Muslims from membership. However, whenever the reverse happens, the cry is "discrimination!"