THREE CHEERS FOR MR DAVID CAMERON -
Reading one of the national newspapers (which I only do at the most once a week) I spotted a bit by Mr Cameron on his 'greatest achievement for 2014' which was the law allowing 'same-sex marriages'. Can someone please inform Mr Cameron of the Eternal Laws relating to this -
Male + Male = 0
Female + Female = 0
Male + Female = Child
When this Eternal Law is broken our Folk cannot survive, since without children there will be no future generations. People should question why Mr Cameron wishes this upon our Folk!
The second 'achievement' mentioned by our Mr Cameron is that Britain has the fastest-growing economy; before we pat ourselves on the back for this, it has only come about by including in our economy drugs and prostitution. What sort of sick society bases their economy on drugs and prostitution? More to the point is that we have here the reason the 'War against Drugs' never actually achieves anything - for if it did our economy would fail. It is the small petty drug-dealers on the street that are caught, and they can be replaced.
All this gives us good reason to put more and more effort into creating a Spiritual Revolution that will put an end to this hell-on-earth created by the Dark Forces that rule us today. We need to be even more fanatical about this in the sense of an urgency, since things are getting worse and worse in this land.
41 comments
I don't remember the bit where David Cameron banned opposite-sex marriages.
And gays have been living together for decades. What difference can it make to the rest of you if they now have a marriage certificate?
I never thought I'd say this, but yes, three cheers for David Cameron for doing the decent thing by supporting same-sex marriages.
Oh and Stinky? For the last time, same-sex marriage does not invalidate opposite-sex marriage. This is not a zero-sum game.
Ignoring the fact that overpopulation is one of the gravest threats to the continuation of the human race in the not too distant future, whether gay people are allowed to get a marriage certificate or not will bear little effect on how many of them would have biological children. Plus, as has been said numerous times, Mr Ingessunu, same-sex marriage laws don't turn straight people gay, they don't stop people from breeding. What they do do, however, is set up environments in which gay couples are more likely to adopt children who would otherwise not have any parents at all, and grow up in institutions.
It's all good stuff, Mr Ingessunu. There are no logical arguments against it.
Why don't these people understand that marriage has nothing to do with a person's sexuality? Preventing homosexuals from marrying does not automatically make them hetero and have them marry and children with the opposite gender. Bigoted idiots.
So they should stop with that crap that says "less gay marriages = more hetero marriages". It simply makes no sense at all.
Also, the world is already overpopulated. We reallly don't need more children.
Wulf Ingessunu: "Male + Male = 0 Female + Female = 0 Male + Female = Child! When this Eternal Law is broken our Folk cannot survive, since without children there will be no future generations!"
Opponent of Wulf Ingessunu: "Allowing same-sex marriage won't change the fact that MOST people are heterosexual, who'll want to marry Male + Female. Plus bisexuals who choose the same. Future generations will keep coming!"
Wulf: "NO, THEY WON'T!!! Allowing same-sex marriage will cause more and more until-now straight people to get SEDUCED INTO the gay lifestyle! Until NO ONE wants to engage in reproductive sex anymore!! People should question why Mr Cameron wishes this upon our Folk!!!"
How many children do you have, Wulf Ingessunu? How many children does your mini-me Wotans Krieger have?
I'd imagine that joining (or starting, in your case) a neo-Nazi cult based on a 1980s ITV series will pretty much kill your chances with any romantic partner of either sex.
In fact, given that lesbians can reproduce via artificial insemination, it seems quite plausible to me that homosexuals actually have a higher proportional fertility rate than Woden's Folk members.
Male + Male = 0
Female + Female = 0
Male + Female = Child
If you're going to use procreation as the basis for marriage, then are you going to prevent infertile couples from marrying? Are you going to outlaw birth control and sterilization procedures for married couples? Are you going to force couples to divorce if they don't have children?
When this Eternal Law is broken our Folk cannot survive, since without children there will be no future generations.
We already have gay people in the world, and yet our population passed the 7 billion mark. We may go extinct at some point, but it won't be because of gay people.
Fertile spouse + infertile spouse = 0
So, by your own logic, does that mean we should outlaw infertile people from getting married?
All this gives us good reason to put more and more effort into creating a Spiritual Revolution that will put an end to this hell-on-earth created by the Dark Forces that rule us today.
We're working on it. Christianity still exists, though, so it's a difficult fight.
Fundies are so one dimensional!
To them it either all straight or all gay. They have difficulty comprehending that the world is more complex than their simple dictator could ever create. The population will be fine because not all individuals are gay....but not all will be straight either
Me (Female) + Husband (Male) = 0
Argument debunked!
As only about 5-10 percent of the population is homosexual, them not producing children is not a threat to human-kind, but a GOOD thing, as we are already way too many humans on this Earth.
Why do you think that when gays are allowed to marry, ONLY gays will marry, and straights won't even have children out of wedlock?
To me it sounds like you're part of those Dark Forces...
"Dark Forces". Sounds like a video game(hey, wait, it IS a f***ing video game!)
@anothga
Infertile spouse + infertile spouse = 0
I know a fundie couple like that. Both 100% sterile. They adopted 2 wonderful Colombian kids afterwards, but it's been a shock to them to discover that God had other plans for them than being a baby factory.
Eternal Laws relating to this -
Male + Male = 0
Female + Female = 0
Male + Female = Child
Then explain infertile couples. And what about elderly couples? Should they be forced to divorce because they can't produce children? What about couples that don't want children or aren't financially or emotionally ready for one? Should we force them to either breed or split up?
If the only purpose of marriage is to have children, then you need to change the rules to require all couples to be pregnant before they're married. Otherwise there are going to be a lot of annulments when couples find out they can't have children. So, premarital sex will now be required?
Note my place (since I'm not British) but I'll say it anyway: it's about bloody time.
I still don't understand people who think that legalising gay marriage will magically turn the entire population gay. Are they all in the closet?
++"Male + Male = 0
Female + Female = 0
Male + Female = Child
When this Eternal Law is broken our Folk cannot survive, since without children there will be no future generations."
Actually breaking that law would ensure future generations by enabling almost any two people to breed and reproduce.
Older male + older female = 0. Are you going to have a maximum age for marriage?
The informal economy is not just drugs and prostitution; it's simply transactions that are not declared to the taxman. In Kosovo, for example, that's most of the economy.
All this gives us good reason to put more and more effort into creating a Spiritual Revolution that will put an end to this hell-on-earth created by the Dark Forces that rule us today.
Let's get this straight: you say Britain relies economically on drugs and prostitution and you also say you want a Spiritual Revolution to get rid of them. So you love Britain so much you want to bankrupt it?
When this Eternal Law is broken our Folk cannot survive, since without children there will be no future generations.
No-one is suggesting same-sex marriage should be compulsory, you twerp.
before we pat ourselves on the back for this, it has only come about by including in our economy drugs and prostitution
And that's just a flat lie.
His quaint talk of Eternal Law has an element of truth in it. If human populations had high rates of exclusive homosexuality then they would have trouble maintaining numbers. It might be no accident that cross-culturally homosexual numbers are constantly low, around a few percent. There may well be hidden biological factors holding down numbers to a tolerable level in evolutionary terms.
Dark Forces ruling us? Sounds paranoid, but there's a respectable hypothesis that psychopathy is on the rise in Western cultures, and we know that psychopathic types are attracted to power.
These are real closet gays. They honestly think that gay sex is so fantastic that once we legalise gay marriage, they'll be no straights having children. It doesn't work like that. Whilst we're all for marriage equality, the majority of us just aren't interested in gay sex. We are what we are, and no amount of law is going to make straights gay or gays straight. Marriage equality accepts reality and puts a bit more fairness into society.
@
nazani14
Just show me these stats where illegal activities are measured as part of the GNP. They probably should be, but governments are pretty coy about that.
It's true all right. It's all part of an EU directive to better reflect the actual real economic activity of a country. There was a big hoo haw last year because the inclusion of drugs and prostitution in our figures meant that our contributions to the EU went up.
@Anton
"His quaint talk of Eternal Law has an element of truth in it."
Show us one quoted instance where David Cameron disapproves of Elton John and David Furnish having two sons, or your precious 'truth' is actually lies.
But then messrs. John and Furnish prove you wrong, do they not? And to prove you more wrong than you can possibly imagine:
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/may/21/labour-cameron-gay-marriage-bill
Not only was Conservative PM David Cameron the main supporter of the Same-Sex Marriage Bill, he even needed Ed Miliband's Labour Party backing such, to ensure it's passing.
So much for your precious 'truth', eh Anton? Like you, completely refuted, and proven to be lies.
Sucks to be always proved wrong, eh right-wingers? The rest of us wouldn't know about that, however.
Good luck with your "Tilting at Windmills " that is reality, Don Quixote, aka Anton. Changing reality to as you would wish it to be is working. Isn't it?
'All homosexuals are pederasts'? Sounds paranoid.
@JW
"The Female case is left as an exercise to the reader."
Male + Male = 0
2Male = 0
Male = 0/2
Male = 0
Female + Female = 0
2Female = 0
Female = 0/2
Female = 0
Male + Female = Child
0 + 0 = Child
Child = 0
So:
Male = 0
Female = 0
Child = 0
Obviously, this works out that all people are equal.
"Reading one of the national newspapers (which I only do at the most once a week)"
...the "Daily FAIL", amirite?
Also, Sir Elton John, David Furnish and their two sons. NEXT!
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.